The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1969 - 1972 Blazers and Jimmys Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-30-2005, 11:55 PM   #1
DANL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 348
Would You Replace The Edelbrock

Hey members, the exhaust on my 72K5, with a 350 four speed, always smells as if it is running rich. The mechanic tells me the Edelbrock needs rebuilding even though it is only four years old with 10K miles. Therefore I am thinking about replacing it with a quadrajet. Any thoughts, pros, cons or recommendations on where to buy would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

...Dan
DANL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 07:53 AM   #2
'68OrangeSunshine
Senior Member
 
'68OrangeSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,506
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

A rebuild kit will only cost you about a tenth of what a new carb will run. Carter AFBs [and their Edelbrock "performer" clones] are easy to rebuild. You don't even have to dismount the fuel bowl to replace gaskets, inspect floats etc.
Some people swear by the Q-jet. I'm not one of them. No bias, but limited experience. I have run Holleys -- a 390 CFM on my previous 292 and a 780 CFM double pumper on the 454 -- good carbs when they ran right, but tuning was an expert's domain. One wrong move and sproing. Then the power valves... Forget it.
I like the AFB design for its simplicity.
__________________


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not.
'68OrangeSunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 10:23 AM   #3
Blue4x4
Senior Member
 
Blue4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 790
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

With the fuel nowadays, if you let your rig sit awhile, it will gum up. I have used the edelbrock 1406 on 3 trucks and found it to gum up easily. Best of luck.
Blue4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 10:40 AM   #4
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

It`s the fuel,not the carb to blame.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 12:25 PM   #5
jcfoote60
Active Member
 
jcfoote60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 263
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

Have you tried running any fuel additives/carb cleaner products through it? I personally like the old Q-jet thump of the large secondaries when you mash it to the floor and it knocks you back in the seat, it's a personal preference really, buying a new Q-jet is spendy and like others have said the AFB is a simple as it gets and a very dependable design. Keep in mind the design was created when there was REAL fuel available with lead additives and what not. Good luck.
jcfoote60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 02:08 PM   #6
blazerparts
No,I DON'T have Tourett's
 
blazerparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 556
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

1406's on mine too and both seem to run rich. Going to see about re-jetting for this altitude. Some people (and Edlebrock) say fuel pressure shouldn't exceed 5 psi.
__________________
'72 K5 CST 350/350 Daily Driver
'69 GMC3500 Camper Special CST Flatbed 396/400 Upgraded to show truck
'69 GMC 2500 L6292, 3spd beater
blazerparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 02:57 PM   #7
badchev69
Active Member
 
badchev69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Stayton, Oregon 97383
Posts: 178
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

I had simmilar probloms on my K5, This happened shortly after putting in a high duration 4x4 cam... I fixed my problom by putting in stronger metering rod springs to compensate for the loss of vacume. With the new cam pulling less vacume the metering rods were staying open causing an always rich condition.

Since then i have put a demon carb on because im much more familiar with the holley/demon setups. hope u figure it out too..
__________________
1969 C10 SWB /350 vortech/th400
1968 SWB build (in progress)
1969 SWB build (my son's future project)
1968 camaro yellow/white stripes (wife's car)

2011 GMC reg cab short bed 2wd daily driver 5/7 drop on 22's

1972 K5 Blazer 13"/11"lift,38"M/T MTZ's, 3" cust exst.
350/350 (sold it )
badchev69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 03:46 PM   #8
MACO
Registered User
 
MACO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: British Columbia CANADA
Posts: 118
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

My truck came with a Edelbrock 1406 carb and also ran very rich and blowing black smoke, the kind of exhaust that would make your eyes water when walking by the tailpipe. I rejetted leaner by changing the jets and metering rods and the smell is much less and the truck runs great. I have been meaning to check my exhaust emission on the gas anilizer at work to get a idea as to where my jetting is, I figure these older engine should run about 2-3% CO. Jetting leaner did not help my fuel mileage much, but I can say the Edelbrock carb has been a reliable unit for daily driving.
__________________
1969 C20 Customer Camper CST, 396, TH400, Factory A/C, Olive Green.
MACO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 05:18 PM   #9
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,537
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

Had the same issue with most of the Edelbrocks I've run also...

I like the design but not the Edelbrock's, I find old Carter AFB's, rebuild them and never look back. Always happy with the results.

I've had some Holley's and Q-jets run great also though...
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 10:38 PM   #10
DANL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 348
Would You Replace The Edelbrock

Hey everybody thanks for the feedback as it appears I am not the only one with this problem. I actually have not driven my K5 in two years, but the exhaust smelled rich when the Edelbrock was new. It also would make my eyes water. Thanks again and I will keep you in the solution loop.

...Dan
DANL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2005, 10:56 PM   #11
LUV2XCLR8
The LuvShack Garage
 
LUV2XCLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maple Grove, TN (West Side)
Posts: 30,468
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

Holley here, my first one ever owned, seems to do fine
__________________
Owner/Op: "TN Classic Transport Carriers"
The Toy: "Square Vette" 72 Hybrid Blazer
Toy Barn: "LuvShack" 40 x 60 x 20 Shop
Tow Piggy:"Maddy" 88 Silverado 3500
Hauler: "Feathers" 14 Aluma 8218T
LUV2XCLR8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2006, 07:27 AM   #12
'68OrangeSunshine
Senior Member
 
'68OrangeSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,506
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

If you're not running your blazer that much, there's this stuff you can add to your gas to keep it from turning to varnish in the tank or jerry can for one year. It's called Sta-Bil. Runs about $10 for a large bottle [24~28 Oz] but you only need 2 Oz per 5 Gallons. For a 20 Gallon tank, that's 8 Oz. I keep spare gas in several jerry cans and spike them all with this stuff. When I add a can of real old gas, it's always better to top it off with another 5 Gallons of fresh gas. But I use it to buy cheap and hoard so I won't be as dependant on the pump pirates.
__________________


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not.
'68OrangeSunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 12:30 AM   #13
DANL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 348
Would You Replace The Edelbrock

I have not driven it in two years but hope to start driving it soon. I have not used any fuel additives or carb cleaner. Sounds like good advice and will try to remember if I plan not to drive it for a while.

I have decided to get a Rochester Quadrajet but not certain which one is correct for a 72 K5 350 four speed. Any advise would be appreciated.

Thanks again.

...Dan
DANL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 01:08 PM   #14
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazerparts
1406's on mine too and both seem to run rich. Going to see about re-jetting for this altitude. Some people (and Edlebrock) say fuel pressure shouldn't exceed 5 psi.

Bro,

With elevation you HAVE to lean em out. I called the Edelbrock help line and the guy turned me on to the right jet and rod size for my elevation. I am at 5,000 ft and the jet size is like 5-6 smaller than stock, so elevation is more likely if you are above sealevel. I own many carb'd cars so I am considering the purchase of sniffer tool that shows the fuel to air ratio in the exhaust (the only way to tune a carb by the way without guessing) It has a probe much like an O2 sensor that collects the ratios and displays them in real time so you can tune idle as well as under load aka driving at part and wot. It is not too spendy, like $200 and if you own a carb or multiple it is worth the money to tune for perf and fuel econ.
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 01:50 PM   #15
Jason915
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 693
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

For my altitude I tuned my power/cruse and secondary 8% leaner and it runs well but my altitude is 6200# (Colorado Springs)
__________________
1971 GMC K1500 SWB Fleetside, 4" skyjacker softride and, 14 Bolt FF, HD Dana 44 4.10's

1970 K5 TBI conversion lifted etc SOLD
1968 C20 camper truck SOLD


“To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless.” Jeff Snyder
Jason915 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 02:02 PM   #16
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,270
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason915
For my altitude I tuned my power/cruse and secondary 8% leaner and it runs well but my altitude is 6200# (Colorado Springs)


The jet and rod size I was given came with the claimer that this is a starting point only. This is why I planning the purchase of the tuner (I read about it in Carcraft about 6-8 months ago and it seemed slick!) Read your plugs, if they are black lean it out if that nice brownish tinge then it is A-OK.

Last edited by 70rs/ss; 01-06-2006 at 02:04 PM.
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2006, 09:16 PM   #17
gmc71
Registered User
 
gmc71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 115
Re: Would You Replace The Edelbrock

***Editted by moderator*** If you want to buy something do it on the Parts Board***


Quote:
Originally Posted by DANL
I have not driven it in two years but hope to start driving it soon. I have not used any fuel additives or carb cleaner. Sounds like good advice and will try to remember if I plan not to drive it for a while.

I have decided to get a Rochester Quadrajet but not certain which one is correct for a 72 K5 350 four speed. Any advise would be appreciated.

Thanks again.

...Dan
__________________
72 Chevy 4x4 350
55 Chevy Bel Air 350/350
53 Matchless G80s (motorcycle)
06 Trailblazer SS 400hp LS2

Last edited by krue; 01-10-2006 at 12:16 AM.
gmc71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com