Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
08-15-2008, 09:31 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
348 or 409 "W" engines
Has anyone ever installed a 348 or 409 "W" engine in a 67-72 or seen one installed? Do they bolt in? Are there amy clearance or fitment issues? Are there any headers available?
I was thinking it would be really cool to step outside the box of standard sb and bb Chevy engines and install one of these in a truck. Any info or pics would be great.
__________________
|
08-15-2008, 11:38 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: pittsburgh pa
Posts: 1,970
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
I like the way you think...I think I saw one on here once.. I had a 409 mocked in to a 67 Nova I was building once but sold it before it was finished..
__________________
68 C10 Shorty TPI,Bagged, and all the good stuff. Classic trucks feature June 06, On the cover of Jegs Christmas Catalog 08 67 C10 Shorty Shop truck project Bagged and Z'd under destruction and getting nowhere fast. 64 C10 Shop Truck/Daily driver, Bagged, Dropmember, SOLD!!!! Gone but not forgotten.. 54 GMC under the knife getting a S10 chassis swap and bagged. See my build thread... 07 GMC Sierra 5/7 drop, 22's and 24's Air ride on my mind.. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=339340 See pics of my trucks in my profile |
08-15-2008, 11:54 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Maynardville, Tn
Posts: 3,030
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
I don't think there would be any problem. The only thing I would question would be the mounts. BH is the same, the only other issue would be brackets. I think it would be a really cool install. Something different. I know a fellow in Knoxville that did have some 348/409 stuff. Let me know if you need anything and we will give him a call.
Any parts for these will be big $$$ though.
__________________
SEMA Network- Protect our Hobby! 71 C30 in pieces, starting to come together. Click here for A Place For Tennessee Truck Enthusiest To Meet Last edited by woodridge; 08-15-2008 at 11:54 AM. |
08-15-2008, 12:12 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Franklinton NC
Posts: 1,309
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
On horsepower tv they just had a show about a guy specializing in 409s.
|
08-15-2008, 12:22 PM | #5 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 1,599
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
Thats the only bad thing is parts are really hard to get. I was just speaking with the guy who is doing my seat and he had one he was trying to get ready for his Chevelle
|
08-15-2008, 12:26 PM | #6 |
I'm a poor spectator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 2,287
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
In Peterson's 4wheel magazine I saw a 69 or 70 4x4 with a 409. I'm guessing they modified the hell out the firewall to make that thing fit in it or just moved it up a lot.
__________________
2006 Jeep Unlimited IMPACT ORANGE 1993 Chevy 2500 4x4 ExCab LWB 454/NV4500 Tow rig 1977 Ford F100 2x4 LWB 1st truck I owned, still have it!!! 1979 Ford F150 4x4 SWB Built Ford Tough!!! 1971 Chevy Blazer 350 / SM465 / NP205 UNDER CONSTRUCTION Soon to have a LQ4 6.0!!! |
08-15-2008, 01:56 PM | #7 |
1FINE69
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 239
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
There is or was one around the metro detroit area in a burb, it was silver and the guy looked like he was a GM goodwrencher. I'll see if I have pics. I think it needed to have the airbox on the firewall removed for clearance possibly some brake booster issues too.
__________________
Had a 69 swb fleetside 350zz3 w 400turbo trans oak lined bed with rhino coated sides red exterior. SOLD |
08-15-2008, 02:07 PM | #8 |
Old Skool Club
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
Those things started life as truck motors, so putting one in a truck ain't no big thang.
Putting one in place of a 235 or a 265 in a '55 was one way to get some oohs and aahs when you opened its mouth. In todays times, a W-motor is a relic and certainly a conversation piece. Those big old Edelbrock aluminum valve covers look wild, especially when there's a triad of deuces on the manifold, covered with a set of Stellings helmets. Impressive.....to say the least. Go for it. After all, wasn't the first 427 made from a W-block? Didn't Smokey Yunick have something to do with that? Lotta history in those engines. "She's Real Fine, My 4-0-9" had them for the inspiration for the lyrics. Gotta love 'em.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770 '96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed. '69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo The older I get, the better I was. |
08-15-2008, 12:16 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Moore, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
I saw a streetrod in OSR magazine ('Ol Skool Rodz) about a year ago that really piqued my interest in these things.
I was talking to my dad about those because he had a '59 with a tri power 348 and he said it would "run all day" Which i think is good if i put my Old Timer car jargon translater to it Probaly twice the cash or more than a big block -- but the wow factor would be huge
__________________
Are you retired too? Nonsense! I'm in my prime |
08-15-2008, 01:55 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: King City, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 974
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
hotrod magazine just finished a story about all these new trick parts for the 409's and 348s. including new heads. cant remember, i think it might have been two months ago, ill see if i can find the issue.
...yeah, im really behind on my reading.
__________________
- Jason If you can turn, Youre not going fast enough. Favorite caption: first car to 200 mph in the 1/4 mile, no parachute, drum brakes all the way around.. ..back when men were men. |
08-15-2008, 02:15 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pacifica CA
Posts: 66
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
I just saw a craigslist ad for a 348 today and thought that would cool to put in my 70
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/pts/795913094.html |
08-15-2008, 03:06 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
Did anyone know that in the Beach Boys song 4-0-9, the engine revving at the first of the song was actually a 348. They couldn't find a real 409 in time for the recording, so they used a car with the smaller version instead.
I had actually thought about this when I tore my truck down for the resto, but money was an issue. I also had a good engine and just couldn't justify spending any more cash on another engine. The episode of Horsepower TV this past weekend got the old wheel turning again. I probably won't be able to do this anytime soon, but I just wanted to see if I could find any info. The aftermarket has finally opened up for the W engine family. Edelbrock makes new aluminum heads. JE, Ross, and a few other piston companies offer new pistons. Eagle, and Callies offer stroker cranks and rods. The list goes on. The hard to find commodity is the blocks and real vintage parts. If I decided to go this route on a truck, I would probably lean torward a 348 since the 409 blocks are so rare. I'm glad to see there are others sharing interest in this. Hopefully soon we will be able to see something come of it.
__________________
|
08-15-2008, 03:17 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Santa Maria, Ca.
Posts: 1,423
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
I put a 409 with duel AFB's in a 1963 1/2 ton it bolted right up to the Muncie 3 speed. I learned real quick how to replace gears in that transmission. Later changed to a T-400 and ran fine. Bell housing and motor mounts all worked.
__________________
69 Chevy 4x4 383 Power |
08-15-2008, 03:23 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Buffalo MN
Posts: 606
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
i wish i had a scanner just for this post, in my dads old photo albums from whe he was in high school in the 70's there is a picture of a truck, it doesnt show any of the truck just under the hood but i know its one of our trucks and its got a 409 tripower acording to the valve cover logos and the 3 duces it looked like it fit fine under the hood
__________________
Trial and Error, its expensive but its a mistake i most likely wont make again 1971 chevy k10 custom deluxe http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=341257 1968 chevy k/10 fleet http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=334731 1948 desoto custom coupe fluid drive(family heirloom) |
08-17-2008, 08:46 PM | #15 | |
I have a radical idea!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
Quote:
BTW, I fully support your outside of the box idea on this. There's no doubt that newer LSX engines and even newer EFI 350's are more efficient and more powerful, but they're everywhere. That kind of powerplant would add even more to your already great truck IMO. This same kind of thinking is what attracts me to the old GMC V6's.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435 ‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350 '69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT '69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435 '84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer 67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096 My trucks http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all Member of the 1-Ton Club! |
|
08-15-2008, 03:27 PM | #16 |
The LuvShack Garage
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maple Grove, TN (West Side)
Posts: 30,468
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
I got a buddy looking for a 409, does that count?
__________________
Owner/Op: "TN Classic Transport Carriers" The Toy: "Square Vette" 72 Hybrid Blazer Toy Barn: "LuvShack" 40 x 60 x 20 Shop Tow Piggy:"Maddy" 88 Silverado 3500 Hauler: "Feathers" 14 Aluma 8218T |
08-15-2008, 06:15 PM | #17 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
there used to be a cat on here that had one... but I can't remember his name, and it was at least 3 or 4 years ago
|
08-15-2008, 06:58 PM | #18 |
20' Daredevil (Ret)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,731
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
When I was in my early teens (in the early Sixties), there was a kid in town with a straight-axle '55 Shoebox, with a lumpy 409 and two four-barrel carbs. He said he only got 3 mpg (yup, three) so he switched to a single four-barrel and doubled his mileage to 6 mpg.
Maybe a bit off-topic but I couldn't help passing it along...
__________________
- Mike - 1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205 RIP El Jay |
08-15-2008, 10:21 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 894
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
Help a "youngster" out. What's the hype with these engines? I've never heard of a "W" block before. Something of an "original" Big Block?
__________________
-Chris Building a stripper, one part at a time: 1969 K5, 307, 3spd, 3 seats, hard top. Added Pwr Discs, Pwr Steering, Aux Battery, T-case Skid, Lighted Sidemarkers, HEI, Lock-Right Diff, ECE Class IV Hitch, 32" MT/Rs. Parts to Install: Hand Throttle, Console, Tow Hooks, Dual Horns, AM-FM, Dealer Swing-Away Tire Carrier, Gas Tank Skid. Also building a 1950 Willys CJ-3A and off-roading a 2001 Nissan Frontier on 1-Ton Portals... Last edited by 69TowRig; 08-15-2008 at 10:22 PM. |
08-15-2008, 11:04 PM | #20 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
google is your friend
http://www.348-409.com/ |
08-16-2008, 12:45 AM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: roosevelt utah
Posts: 325
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
I would LOVE to put one in my 61. But after some research I dont think it would fit in my budget. These engines are SPENDY!
The cool factor is super high though. I would settle for the 348 as I would like it for the looks more than anything.
__________________
-61 c10 short step -67 c10 short step -71 k10 long fleet -77 k20 long fleet (gettin all the goodies from frankentruck) -79 c30/k30 3+3 frankentruck (cab and frame for sale) -99 GMC yukon daily driver |
08-16-2008, 12:29 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
The 348 was originally designed as a work truck engine. The 409 was commonly used in farm and work trucks. Neither was a very strong long lasting block. First out in mid 61, the 409 was used to try to run with the mopars but usually came up a bit short. They are neat but when you consider that today, a core can cost you $2,000. ---and a good running one might be $3,000.++---that's a lot to throw at a truck. You can get more power out of a 396-454 for a whole lot less money. Street rodders love the 348-409 W blocks for the looks--not necessarly for the performance.
In fact, I personally don't believe GM ever made a big block that will last as long as a good set up 350---010 short block. Power per cube and life of motor!!! Ever hear about a 200-300,000 mile big block??? My 2nd car was a 58 Impala 348 and my best buddy bought a 63 409--400hp. Noisey as hell with solid lifters and my brothers worked 327 would run with it all day long!! huck |
08-19-2008, 07:34 PM | #23 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Shelley Idaho
Posts: 876
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
Quote:
__________________
1970 Nova 327/T5 (my 1st car) 1971 K-20 350/350/205 (winter DD) 1953 GMC Suburban 1968 Chevy Bel Air 1976 Chev C-10 1972 Skylark (suncoupe) 1 of 3943 made |
|
08-16-2008, 12:46 PM | #24 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
warren, I do know for a fact the new roller cam big blocks (generation 4 is it?) DO in fact last hundreds of thousands of miles with no work. I have a buddy who has 3 of them, all in between 200 to 400 thousand on them, and the fleet of 3500HDs we work on for the city of columbus all have 200k+ on them pretty much all unopened too.
As for the OLDer big blocks though... I'll agree with you. |
08-16-2008, 01:37 PM | #25 |
Running on empty
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Roanoke, Virginia
Posts: 1,033
|
Re: 348 or 409 "W" engines
It was the August issue of Hot Rod Magazine that had the article on the new 409 heads from Edelbrock
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_...olet_409.shtml definately would amp up the cool factor with one of these engines in the truck
__________________
_____________________________________________ Tim We have two rules here at the Rock. Rule #1: No writing on the walls. Rule#2: Obey all rules 70 GMC Sierra Grande "Custom Camper" Longhorn 402 Big Block TH400 PS PB factory AC Posi; 94 Bronco XLT 302, auto;worn out daily driver |
Bookmarks |
|
|