The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2009, 05:25 PM   #1
lifted 75 k5
Registered User
 
lifted 75 k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chino valley arizona
Posts: 79
static or bags

i have decided to lower my 77 short bed and i want to go with bags but at 17 dont have a big budget so could i static drop then go back and put bags on in a couple more years or just bo it right the first time and save for the bags
__________________
LIFTED OR LOWERED EITHER WAY STOCK SUCKS

75 Chevy blazer
86 trx 250R
1990 Ford Ranger 2wd prerunner project
lifted 75 k5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 09:13 PM   #2
tylerg.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 72
Re: static or bags

if bags is what you really want, save and go with bags. But their not very practical for a daily driver.

But you can get a show-worthy stance out of a good drop kit for a third the price and drive it every day.
tylerg. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 09:25 PM   #3
Ds86C10
2WD 4 Life
 
Ds86C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
Posts: 169
Re: static or bags

id say static. nice and simple.
__________________
Big D
1969 c10
1960 cadillac
1978 king cobra
Ds86C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 12:07 PM   #4
Tony@AirRideTech
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huntingburg IN
Posts: 620
Re: static or bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by tylerg. View Post
But their not very practical for a daily driver.

Actually.... I dissagree completly. If you have a truck that is a daily driver and especially still built ot be used like a truck, good riding daily driver, load carrier and a sport truck with great handling at the same time.... A good quality air system is the most effective and efficient means of accomplishing that.

N2... I love your truck dude.... those photos are just too sweet man!
Tony@AirRideTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 02:28 PM   #5
baggedcten
86 C10
 
baggedcten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ga.
Posts: 416
Re: static or bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony@AirRideTech View Post
Actually.... I dissagree completly. If you have a truck that is a daily driver and especially still built ot be used like a truck, good riding daily driver, load carrier and a sport truck with great handling at the same time.... A good quality air system is the most effective and efficient means of accomplishing that.

N2... I love your truck dude.... those photos are just too sweet man!
I agree I've been daily driving my bagged truck for about,almost 7 years no problems.

I also agree that N2 has a sweet truck
__________________
1986 C10
2001 chevy silverado purchased 8-29-09 sold
2004 silverado purchased 8-27-10 sold
baggedcten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 09:13 PM   #6
tylerg.
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 72
Re: static or bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony@AirRideTech View Post
Actually.... I dissagree completly. If you have a truck that is a daily driver and especially still built ot be used like a truck, good riding daily driver, load carrier and a sport truck with great handling at the same time.... A good quality air system is the most effective and efficient means of accomplishing that.

N2... I love your truck dude.... those photos are just too sweet man!
true, but i guess what i meant to say was that riding around layin frame is not the best idea for driving around town is it?
tylerg. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 11:41 AM   #7
blazer2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vernon b.c.
Posts: 3,022
Re: static or bags

I have both ,static on a truck and bags on a blazer,the bags are fun in town but I like the static for the hiway when I go on long trip,don,t have to worry if I,m too low or wearing out the tires or If I broke down with bags in some small town ,where do I get parts,It,s bad enough gettings parts where I am now
blazer2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 11:52 AM   #8
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Re: static or bags

Despite all the concerns over bags on daily drivers, a "properly" installed system can be very reliable.


With that said, I suggest you go with a static drop then add bags later. If you run spindles, a flip kit, and C-notch everything will be used when you bag it. You may have to go with a bigger notch if you want to go really low, but a mild notch will still get you down to a decent height.

Here's my 77 with a mild notch on bags. It has stock fender liners and the bed is uncut.
Attached Images
  
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 04:20 PM   #9
boatpuller
Registered User
 
boatpuller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sun City West, Az
Posts: 3,822
Re: static or bags

i think the key word's are "i don't have a big budget" pretty much answer's your own question.i'm damn near fifty and still saving for a bagged setup. but,if you can afford i wouldn't hesitate. i think it's the way to go.
__________________
" Never look up a dead dogs butt."

Last edited by boatpuller; 01-05-2009 at 04:26 PM.
boatpuller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 08:21 PM   #10
87c10slammer
truck addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: levittown pa
Posts: 154
Re: static or bags

i got my bolt on setup for just under 2000.. if you really do your homework you can find one for half that but you will have to take it to a shop to get put on.. i did mine in my driveway with a few air tools... took me a good weekend but i have yet to drive it... it wont come out of hidding till its done in early spring
87c10slammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 09:29 PM   #11
87c10slammer
truck addict
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: levittown pa
Posts: 154
Re: static or bags

yeah laying frame while driving is strictly for highway.... least then when you loose control you take out 10 people behind you.... no really i am totally against frame draging even if it does look awsome.. i save it for when i pull into parking spots... saves on brakes...lol
87c10slammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 10:44 PM   #12
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Re: static or bags

Thanks for the positive comments guys.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 12:20 AM   #13
vonlefty
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 14
Re: static or bags

***************** is running a special on bags and brackets for the front of your truck for only $150 if that helps sway your judgement any.

If I were you I would bag at least the front, it'll be as cheap to do a simple bag kit up front as it would be to lower it with springs and spindles. Then do a flip kit and notch in the back. You could mono leaf it later on with either a bag over axle set up or even a helper bag set up if you still have a tight budget. This will get you low and the front will still be adjustable.

I remeber when I was 17 I half assed alot of stuff and spent money on stuff that I would replace later on, I was never happy with a project because I never built it exactly like I wanted. I would try to spend a little on the suspension, the stereo, the motor, the wheels etc... but it was always a compromise and it was like that for awhile. When I started my last project I sat down and pictured an overall look for the project, I mapped out goals and timelines of when I wanted to be done with each stage, I did my homework and found great deals on every piece that I added and by the time the first show rolled around I was proud to bring it out and show it off. It wasn't the fastest thing there, it wasn't the car with the most money sunk into it but it still had people checking it out all day because of the details and the time put into doing it right or not doing it at all. Don't lower it because you think it's all you can afford, bag it because you know it's what you want! Sorry for the rant

Last edited by vonlefty; 01-06-2009 at 12:23 AM.
vonlefty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 02:33 AM   #14
heavychevy79
Cheyenne Super
 
heavychevy79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 545
Re: static or bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by vonlefty View Post
***************** is running a special on bags and brackets for the front of your truck for only $150 if that helps sway your judgement any.

If I were you I would bag at least the front, it'll be as cheap to do a simple bag kit up front as it would be to lower it with springs and spindles. Then do a flip kit and notch in the back. You could mono leaf it later on with either a bag over axle set up or even a helper bag set up if you still have a tight budget. This will get you low and the front will still be adjustable.

I remeber when I was 17 I half assed alot of stuff and spent money on stuff that I would replace later on, I was never happy with a project because I never built it exactly like I wanted. I would try to spend a little on the suspension, the stereo, the motor, the wheels etc... but it was always a compromise and it was like that for awhile. When I started my last project I sat down and pictured an overall look for the project, I mapped out goals and timelines of when I wanted to be done with each stage, I did my homework and found great deals on every piece that I added and by the time the first show rolled around I was proud to bring it out and show it off. It wasn't the fastest thing there, it wasn't the car with the most money sunk into it but it still had people checking it out all day because of the details and the time put into doing it right or not doing it at all. Don't lower it because you think it's all you can afford, bag it because you know it's what you want! Sorry for the rant

Man that is so true, I remember (not that long ago) being so poor that I
had to rig stuff, rattle can paint jobs, junkyard inspection stickers,
Chinese parts, shop rags stuffed in the motor mounts and for begging for
junkyard freebies all for a $500 beater.
But even when I had cash to spend, it was hard to let it go, so I compromised
on some things, but ending up wasting money on stuff that didn't do what I wanted it to.
I made it harder on myself, because if I wanted to bag the rear on my 77 I
would now have to torch off the hangers I welded on, or run with a mono
leaf, another compromise.

I see a lot of bagged cars and trucks for sale, so they must not be all that
awesome, or they were not built very well.

IMO it shouldn't be done just to "keep up with the Jones's".
heavychevy79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 11:04 PM   #15
lifted 75 k5
Registered User
 
lifted 75 k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chino valley arizona
Posts: 79
Re: static or bags

thanks n2trux love the truck what size drop is that like a 4-7
__________________
LIFTED OR LOWERED EITHER WAY STOCK SUCKS

75 Chevy blazer
86 trx 250R
1990 Ford Ranger 2wd prerunner project
lifted 75 k5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2009, 11:21 PM   #16
Rollinsqrbdy
Registered User
 
Rollinsqrbdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dexter, N.M.
Posts: 1,082
Re: static or bags

n2trx- I HAVE SEEN MANY PICS. OF YOUR TRUCK AND STILL AINT TIRED OF IT. THAT THING IS FRKN BAD A$$. WHOOOOWHEEE BABY IS IT HOT. WITH THAT SAID I WOULD ALSO DO A STATIC DROP. U NEVER KNOW YOU MIGHT LIKE IT BETTER.
__________________
Its Kool to be a square
2013 Chevy Silverado Z71 w/ 7" lift and 35" Nitto's
1985 C-10 ......My dream truck (under construction)
1984 k 10 Silverado...6" lift with 38.5 super swampers
New Mexico Member
--- Member of the Square Body Club---
Rollinsqrbdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 03:56 AM   #17
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: static or bags

I daily drive a 68 mustang i have air bags front and back. Over the last 3 years never had a problem at all.It does ride nice and smooth even on the roughest of roads out there.A good air bag kit is the key most universal kits suck.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 05:46 AM   #18
willett
Another Day, Another Dollar
 
willett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,316
Re: static or bags

hey blazer 2007, your just down the road from me!
__________________
-78 K20 Cheyenne 454 long box, 4" lift, 35" MT's, '84 cab, '80 box

"its hip to be square"
willett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 12:58 PM   #19
blazer2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vernon b.c.
Posts: 3,022
Re: static or bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by willett View Post
hey blazer 2007, your just down the road from me!
Maybe up the road
blazer2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com