Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-23-2009, 01:20 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melbourne. AUSTRALIA
Posts: 110
|
Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
Help .... I'm getting ready to do a front bag install ,I don't want to lay frame I've sliced a full coil off my lowered coils so I've got the ride height I want, but now I want to improve ride quality as well , what I need is some pictures of front bag installs and some hints on how to go about it .... cheers Ray
|
06-23-2009, 08:39 AM | #2 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
The best I can offer is what it looks like on an 82 Blazer. It's pretty much the same thing. Read through the posts here and you will find tons of info.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
06-23-2009, 11:35 AM | #3 |
It'd be alot cooler if you did
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Three Rivers, MI
Posts: 2,345
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
Here's a pic that really helped me when I built my upper plates... it's the ART kit.
|
06-23-2009, 09:55 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 58
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
N2TRUX, what are guys using for bump stops with a setup like this? The photos don't seem to show one? Anyone know if you can retain your stock front bumps in a 68?
__________________
-M.J. 1968 Stepside |
06-23-2009, 11:54 PM | #5 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
There aren't any stops in those pics. On my 77 we fabricated a riser to mount a stop in the stock location. I wanted the stop to bottom out and allow the truck to roll.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" Last edited by N2TRUX; 06-23-2009 at 11:55 PM. |
06-24-2009, 03:33 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melbourne. AUSTRALIA
Posts: 110
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
thanks N2TRUX thats what I was after , I understand about the top plate but what's the go with the LCA and the bag ? thanks again Ray
|
06-24-2009, 08:47 AM | #7 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
It depends on how low you are trying to go. In my pics, (Chucks pic is better) you will see there is a "cup" attached to the bag on the bottom. This is used to center the bag in the spring pocket.
The cup is attached to the bag but "not" the A-arm. It simply floats and is held in place by the weight of the truck. If you want to go lower, you can cut the cup down to 1/2" thick. This will give you a bit more drop and still hold the bag in place. If your after the max amount of drop, you can go one step further. You can cut the A-arm out and weld a large cup in place, you'll get even more drop. I don't have any pics so you'll have to research a bit more if you choose to go this route.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
06-24-2009, 06:48 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melbourne. AUSTRALIA
Posts: 110
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
Quote:
|
|
06-24-2009, 08:41 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,094
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
Quote:
Bags will ride better if the manufacturers recommended 'ride' height is used. If you start deviating from that, it will change the ride quality & have a ripple affect (are the shocks within the proper range of travel @ ride height, stock bumpstops may need to be cut-down/modified). You might need to combine bags w/other forms of lowering to acheive your desired ride height. Example: I used Firestones 7" diameter bags (2600's), 1.5" lowering blocks, & off the shelf replacement type HD gas shocks in the rear of my 68. To achieve the desired ride height w/these mods, I couldn't run more than 30psi (any more than that & the truck was too high in the rear giving it way too much rake). This lower pressure caused the rear of the truck to be very 'bouncy' (especially noticeable on the highway or a service road). To eliminate the bouncy ride quality, I had to go w/a smaller bag that required a little more pressure to achieve the same overall height & added a taller lowering block. When done, it took about 45psi to now achieve my desired ride height which allowed the bags to perform much better (no bouncing). Just stuff to keep in mind . . .....
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
06-24-2009, 08:51 PM | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melbourne. AUSTRALIA
Posts: 110
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
Quote:
|
|
06-25-2009, 02:17 AM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: melbourne. AUSTRALIA
Posts: 110
|
Re: Pictures of front bag installs on 69 C10
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|