The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2009, 07:18 PM   #1
tkeduk8r
Senior Member
 
tkeduk8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 1,462
Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

I wish I had pics but I dont... didnt feel right taking pictures at the guys place... Looking for insight into what a guy should pay for them...

The first is a 75K original 61 c20 sm window Custom cab... baby blue and white...305V6, SM420 with hand brake, correct radio, still has the 17.5 inch steelies and a complete set of correct clip on style hubcaps... Was owned by the same couple since 1963... no pb or pb, and the cab corners and rockers are gone as usual here in MN, but the bed is IMMACCULATE allthe way around... had a camper in it for years... tailgate is a 7.5 out of 10... no bed trim though... dunno why... chrome/aluminium bumper and grill are mint... iits a coil spring rear with nice trailing arms and looks to be a D60... still has the spiral shocks, but did they offer a D60 in 61??? thought they were only eatons..its been in the garage since 1990... notebook in glove box has every tank of gas put into the truck since 1968, and only 66 miles on the last tank put in in '90...

Second is a 1963 Custom GMC c10.. 305V6, Sm420 also, but was a converted 3-tree... has a very unique shift indicator like a PrnDl, but it has 1-1, 1-R, 1-2,1-3 embossed on it... at first i tought original powerglide column, but this looks like a factory GM part, not a homemade deal...jus tnever seen one before... The truck has its rust too in the cab corners, rockers and fenders, and I think it was a factory bbw cab, BUT they adapted a 70-72 slider into the opening with two pieces of sheet metal and siliconed the *** out of it.... factory opening wasnt hurt it didnt look like... bed is nice with just one dent, but has all the trim, and so does the cab.... taligate is dented, but not bowed... this one also has a factory radio and knobs as well, and a day/nite rearview...

any ideas or other things i may have missed... the guy wants to sell both together and he is a die hard ford guy, so he really has no interest in these.. but i dont think they are stealable either... any ideas????
__________________
63 C20 2WD, 230/SM420/4.11 73K
68 C30 dump truck, 327,SM425,4.56 66K original
68 C10 2WD SWB Stepper, 250/3-tree/3.73 66K.... Wifes
68 Buick Skylark Custom Conv., 350/TH400/2.56 In our family since '79
69 GMC 1500 SWB 2WD, 350/TH350/3.73 posi...
70 K10 SWB 4X4 4-sp,ps, pb, tilt, buckets, console, sliding back window (Need AC parts) WIP
72 Chevy K20 4x4 350/350/205/4.56 donor
72 Vette 350/M21/3.70 posi, triple black and super fast
84 Olds Cutlass Brougham 350/2004r/4.11 was Dad's
tkeduk8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 07:36 PM   #2
Eagar1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 169
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

IMHO the 63 has more potential, as you get all the nice styling of the older trucks but easier to do the suspension and steering mods on, but it depends on what you want to make it into. Of course I have a 63 so I am biased =).
I had a 62 that rode very nice on the torsion bar suspension.
I got a c20 cause I want to tow and haul with it so again depends on what you want it to do.
Pics would be nice.
Eagar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 10:10 PM   #3
Corts60
Just here to tinker
 
Corts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,697
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

Of course we are all biased on our own year of trucks so I would go with the '61. I LOVE the trailing arm and torsion bar suspensions. They are very comfortable to ride in. It also sounds like the '63 has been molested a little more than the '61.

Also, on a side note, GMC's 1/2 tons are called 1000 (C-10) and 3/4 tons are 1500 (C-20)......unless it has a 9 ft bed then it is a 2500.

Pics would definitely help us determine prices...
Corts60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 11:21 PM   #4
padresag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

sounds like a hydramatic trans
ron
padresag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 11:59 PM   #5
markeb01
Senior Enthusiast
 
markeb01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 8,356
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

The shifter sounds bizzare, never seen anything like that. GMC's with automatics had Oldsmobile Hydramatics, but the only shift pattern I've every seen is N D 2 1 R, or something like this. Reverse is always on the bottom, which caused a lot of accidents, and lawsuits against GM, and was the standard for years due to the cost to change everything to get reverse off the bottom of the pattern. The driveability problem normally occured when a person was descending a hill with a heavy load and was driving in low gear. The vehicle would go too fast, so the driver would pull down into low, and already being there would shift into reverse instead. It was very entertaining, as I was in a car when my dad performed this very drill.

The rear axle is most likely a Dana 44. It's the only axle I've seen in GMC's of this vintage. They may have offered a D60, but I've never seen one. The covers are the same shape except for size.

On the overall question, I'd suggest there are two basic question that should lead to the solution:
1. What do you want to do to/with the truck when it's finished, and -
2. Condition. It's the same rule that applies to real estate - location, location, location. With trucks of this vintage it's condition, condition, condition.

If you want a restored truck you are going to haul things in, go to the dumps, drive to local car shows, etc - the 60-62 chassis is just fine. In fact it's more expensive, stronger and better built than the 63-66 design. The torsion bar suspension provides an excellent ride and offers adjustable ride height. It will cost more to restore since the replacement parts all cost more than the newer items. Ball joints, wheel bearings, steering linkage, etc. If it's bent, it will be much harder to repair since it is essentially a convertible frame and very rigid. If it's straight, it will no doubt stay that way forever unless it's wrecked. I have seen the later frames bend in the middle when a heavy camper was loaded, allowing the camper to lean forward and touch the cab.

If you want a street rod, this chassis is not the best choice. In order to upgrade to disc brakes the easiest method is to change the entire front crossmember, suspension and steering linkage to the 73-87 design. With the 63-66 this isn't necessary, you can add the later parts to the existing crossmember.

Virtually everything hot rod related in the aftermarket is exclusively for the 63 and newer. If you want air suspension and dropped ride, the newer chassis is an easier and cheaper way to go. And yes, there are exceptions to everything, but with the earlier chassis it's up to you to figure it all out. I have a 1960 so I've been there.

The condition of which rig you choose (assuming you can't afford to get both) will set the tone for the rest of the project, no matter which chassis you select. Rust repair is expensive, so the least you can get by with will really save in the long run.

Last consideration is the small or big back window. The big back window is highly desirable now, but was never all that popular when new, which is why they are so rare now. Riding around in front of all that glass will roast your back and neck, which is part of why the small back window was always more popular. But if the bbw is what you want, that should be a major priority as converting a small window to a bbw is major surgery or cab replacement. If it's important to have the bbw go that way now and save yourself headaches in the future.

Good luck.
markeb01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 12:02 AM   #6
slepysal
Registered User
 
slepysal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Jose NOR*CAL
Posts: 3,080
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

what are they asking for them ?
__________________
1960 Apache long bed fleet L6 250 Clifford intake 2 bbl carb. Langdon cast headers with dual exhaust and bellflower tips. T-5 5 speed, power steering and power disc brakes.

"Over, Around or through it... "
slepysal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 01:28 AM   #7
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

The Dana 60's were an option in the 3/4 ton 60's trucks, but I have not seen them on a coil spring suspension prior to '71. I've mostly seen them in K20's
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 01:49 AM   #8
padresag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

Quote:
Originally Posted by markeb01 View Post
The shifter sounds bizzare, never seen anything like that. GMC's with automatics had Oldsmobile Hydramatics, but the only shift pattern I've every seen is N D 2 1 R, or something like this. Reverse is always on the bottom, which caused a lot of accidents, and lawsuits against GM, and was the standard for years due to the cost to change everything to get reverse off the bottom of the pattern. The driveability problem normally occured when a person was descending a hill with a heavy load and was driving in low gear. The vehicle would go too fast, so the driver would pull down into low, and already being there would shift into reverse instead. It was very entertaining, as I was in a car when my dad performed this very drill.

The rear axle is most likely a Dana 44. It's the only axle I've seen in GMC's of this vintage. They may have offered a D60, but I've never seen one. The covers are the same shape except for size.

On the overall question, I'd suggest there are two basic question that should lead to the solution:
1. What do you want to do to/with the truck when it's finished, and -
2. Condition. It's the same rule that applies to real estate - location, location, location. With trucks of this vintage it's condition, condition, condition.

If you want a restored truck you are going to haul things in, go to the dumps, drive to local car shows, etc - the 60-62 chassis is just fine. In fact it's more expensive, stronger and better built than the 63-66 design. The torsion bar suspension provides an excellent ride and offers adjustable ride height. It will cost more to restore since the replacement parts all cost more than the newer items. Ball joints, wheel bearings, steering linkage, etc. If it's bent, it will be much harder to repair since it is essentially a convertible frame and very rigid. If it's straight, it will no doubt stay that way forever unless it's wrecked. I have seen the later frames bend in the middle when a heavy camper was loaded, allowing the camper to lean forward and touch the cab.

If you want a street rod, this chassis is not the best choice. In order to upgrade to disc brakes the easiest method is to change the entire front crossmember, suspension and steering linkage to the 73-87 design. With the 63-66 this isn't necessary, you can add the later parts to the existing crossmember.

Virtually everything hot rod related in the aftermarket is exclusively for the 63 and newer. If you want air suspension and dropped ride, the newer chassis is an easier and cheaper way to go. And yes, there are exceptions to everything, but with the earlier chassis it's up to you to figure it all out. I have a 1960 so I've been there.

The condition of which rig you choose (assuming you can't afford to get both) will set the tone for the rest of the project, no matter which chassis you select. Rust repair is expensive, so the least you can get by with will really save in the long run.

Last consideration is the small or big back window. The big back window is highly desirable now, but was never all that popular when new, which is why they are so rare now. Riding around in front of all that glass will roast your back and neck, which is part of why the small back window was always more popular. But if the bbw is what you want, that should be a major priority as converting a small window to a bbw is major surgery or cab replacement. If it's important to have the bbw go that way now and save yourself headaches in the future.

Good luck.
I have see a 62 GMC with that shift pattern and it is sitting only a few mi. from where I am located
ron
padresag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 02:03 AM   #9
markeb01
Senior Enthusiast
 
markeb01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 8,356
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

Hi padresag, are you referring to the 1-1, 1-r, 1-2, 1-3 pattern? I'm curious, it sounds like there might be a two speed rear axle or something that allows split shifts. I've just never seen this in this series truck, but am always anxious to learn more. I'm wondering what those numbers refer to. Regards.
markeb01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 02:29 AM   #10
padresag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

Quote:
Originally Posted by markeb01 View Post
Hi padresag, are you referring to the 1-1, 1-r, 1-2, 1-3 pattern? I'm curious, it sounds like there might be a two speed rear axle or something that allows split shifts. I've just never seen this in this series truck, but am always anxious to learn more. I'm wondering what those numbers refer to. Regards.
it is similiar to that . it is in a 3/4 t 2 w/dr. It is a hydramatic as I had a look at it as there was no eng in it. I will look into it as I thought that it may be forr sale, but I have enough crap as it is now
ron
padresag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 04:38 PM   #11
tkeduk8r
Senior Member
 
tkeduk8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 1,462
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

Well the guy is looking for 1500 for the pair as we speak, but i dont think there has been a whole lot of interest in them, he did say the price is negotioable, AND he is a die hard 68-79 ford pu guy... This is not the purchase I planned at making at this point, but if the deal was right then id think about it.... and id have to deal with crabby wife as part of the package ....

I am really looking to put togeter al the necessary parts to make a 60-63 k20 out of a 72 k20 frame and running gear, and a nice 60-63 body... I almost hate to bastardize the 61 since it is SO unmolested and has all those GMC only trinkets on it yet (hubcaps, radio, hood, tailgate, etc), but the rockers and corners are gone and the fenders have their typical rot... bed is, like i said, the nicest one i have ever seen on a survivor truck.... The 63 would best be considered a parts truck, vs getting it back on the road... I wish i felt comfortable taking pics but i dont i guess when i am at someones place looking at something...

is that a good price, bad price??? i had half a mind to offer 900 and see what happens and the trucks ar a few hours from me so there would be a hefty fuel bill to bring them both home...
__________________
63 C20 2WD, 230/SM420/4.11 73K
68 C30 dump truck, 327,SM425,4.56 66K original
68 C10 2WD SWB Stepper, 250/3-tree/3.73 66K.... Wifes
68 Buick Skylark Custom Conv., 350/TH400/2.56 In our family since '79
69 GMC 1500 SWB 2WD, 350/TH350/3.73 posi...
70 K10 SWB 4X4 4-sp,ps, pb, tilt, buckets, console, sliding back window (Need AC parts) WIP
72 Chevy K20 4x4 350/350/205/4.56 donor
72 Vette 350/M21/3.70 posi, triple black and super fast
84 Olds Cutlass Brougham 350/2004r/4.11 was Dad's
tkeduk8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 04:53 PM   #12
padresag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
Re: Looked at a 61 and 63 GMC pickups today..

all that you have to remember is that the worst that the guy can say to you is no! sometimes after that though there is no comprimise, you may as well say goodbye to that deal and move on. there will always be others and the next one may well be the one that you wanted in the first place
ron
padresag is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com