The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-17-2010, 11:16 AM   #1
RocketKing
Registered User
 
RocketKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berryville, AR
Posts: 792
static drops and oil pans

Any of you guys running around a 4" drop with the stock truck oil pan.

My pan is sticking about 2" below the front crossmember and with just a 2" drop or so I don't think it would not be a problem but with the 4" things might get tricky.

I did a search but all I could find was bagged trucks that were even lower than mine.

Just wanted some info before I spend some cash on a f-body pan.

Thanks!
__________________
Rex
RocketKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 06:58 PM   #2
LEEVON
Moderator
 
LEEVON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ozark, MO
Posts: 4,888
Re: static drops and oil pans

What truck? I had a to use an f-body pan on my bagged '50. I wouldn't want the oil pan any lower than the front crossmember no matter what. There are a couple other solutions besides f-body but it definitely is the most shallow of the stock wet-sump pans. The GMPP conversion pan for one, Cadillac CTS-V, GTO, Vette...
__________________
'20 Silverado Trail Boss ~ '17 Tahoe ~ '79 K15 Sierra Grande ~ '76 Blazer 2wd ~ '71 Cheyenne swb ~ '55 Pontiac Safari ~'50 3100 bagged ~ '80 Wife ~ Late model kids

Last edited by LEEVON; 11-17-2010 at 06:58 PM.
LEEVON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2010, 08:12 PM   #3
RocketKing
Registered User
 
RocketKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Berryville, AR
Posts: 792
Re: static drops and oil pans

Quote:
Originally Posted by LEEVON View Post
What truck? I had a to use an f-body pan on my bagged '50. I wouldn't want the oil pan any lower than the front crossmember no matter what. There are a couple other solutions besides f-body but it definitely is the most shallow of the stock wet-sump pans. The GMPP conversion pan for one, Cadillac CTS-V, GTO, Vette...
LQ4 engine, that deeep pan. I may have been mistaken but the GMPP conversion was only about an 1" shorter than the stock pan. But I will check into the others and see if one will work, thanks for the heads up.
__________________
Rex
RocketKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com