Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-30-2011, 06:27 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 86
|
Rear Suspension Opinions
My '84 when purchased already had shackles and hangers for a 4" drop. I want it at least another 3" lower (it can be more)to tuck the 31" tires.
I already have purchased new Caltracs for non flip but I can change that easily they said. I am considerling lowering leaf springs as to a flip kit since I already have 4". I want the best set up for straight line traction. I would like your opinions.... It will have around 850hp on the street and more at the track. I am not currently considering a 4 link or ladder bar at this time. Last edited by Magnimike1; 03-30-2011 at 06:27 PM. |
03-30-2011, 07:07 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonora California
Posts: 860
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I'd consider the 4link and beafing the frame. Oh yeah a roll cage too
|
03-30-2011, 07:15 PM | #3 | |
Getcha Pull
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 691
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
triangulated 4-link is my opinion.
__________________
'81 K10 454/SM465 '86 S10 Blazer '95 H-D Softail '96 Integra |
|
03-30-2011, 07:15 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 56
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
For that kind of power, you really do need to look into some frame reinforcements and a 4-link set-up. You will have a very hard time getting any of that power to the ground otherwise. Staying with leaves will probably give you a lot of axle wind-up, and lead to broken rear axles as well.
|
03-30-2011, 08:07 PM | #5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 365
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
Last edited by jrcaprai; 03-30-2011 at 08:08 PM. |
|
03-30-2011, 08:43 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 22
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
x2 for caltracs. X275 cars are going bottom 8s on stock style suspension and a 275 drag radial. I'd do a flip kit and maybe some split mono leafs. Calvert can build those for your application. Add some double adjustable shocks and youll hook on dirt!
|
03-30-2011, 10:21 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 86
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
The motor is a Dart block 377, with Trickflow 215 heads, Victor Jr. intake and a Quick Fuel 750 blow through carb.
Twin 76mm Turbos running E85. Complete Aeromotive Fuel System with -10 supply and -10 return All I need to purchase now is a $3000 Turbo 400 and converter LOL I'll work on getting pictures. Right now it just has the GM crate 290 horse engine and a turbo 350. This will do me until paint and suspension gets Ironed out. My point of my post is that I KNOW that the Caltracs will hold up under some high horse power leaf spring cars. I was just curios which may be better for traction. Flipped or not. I asked Scott at Caltrac and he said either way, but you know how that goes... |
03-31-2011, 10:10 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 56
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
There is a bit of planning and testing that will need to go into either set-up. I wouldn't say that either is a "plug-n-play" type of thing, and will require proper chassis set-up. Those guys that are running 8's on DR's with CalTracs did NOT just slap them on and run. I can assure you of that.
|
03-31-2011, 11:58 AM | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 365
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
He ran really low 60'... but I cannot remember how low? Anyway I asked him about his setup, and he said non-flipped worked best and having his pinion angle at -4.0° I cannot remember his name... I'll see if i can find a video... that thing left hard We definitely need pics of the twins |
|
03-31-2011, 01:06 PM | #11 |
Insert Witty Text Here
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,415
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I'm running the Western Chassis drop leaves with a stock 350. They are only 2 or 3 leaves thick, if that matters.
Slonaker |
03-31-2011, 04:15 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 86
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Thanks for the replies.
Posted via Mobile Device |
03-31-2011, 07:19 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 365
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I found It
Thanks for the help 1984 GMC stock suspension, 396 small block with a Bowtie Overdrive 700r4 with a Moser Dana 60 rear-end 4.11 gear, and CalTracs bars for suspension help. 1.36 60ft with M/T Drag Radials, 10.3 @129 on pump gas and 150 shot. ( by the way 4500lbs street truck) |
03-31-2011, 07:51 PM | #14 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 86
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
03-31-2011, 08:11 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: memphis
Posts: 2,537
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I recall seeing that truck run...that thing hauls...
|
03-31-2011, 09:32 PM | #16 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 86
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
Quote:
|
|
04-01-2011, 09:57 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 56
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
|
04-01-2011, 10:30 AM | #18 |
GoatLube Experss
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: clarksville, Tn.
Posts: 1,337
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
with that much HP a 4 link will be you best bet, far more tuneable than any other option. other options can be made to work, but nothen beat's a "good" 4 link in a drag race application.
__________________
Goat Lube Express, locations in Qalat,Afghanistan & Clarksville, Tn. '87 R30 dually 454/TH400 '85 1/2 ton CCSB '92 S10 350/350 '84 MonteCarlo 383/PG/9"ford '78 Malibu wagon 350/350 '78 Cutlass (project family car) '96 S10 Jimmy (Moma's) |
04-01-2011, 11:53 AM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 389
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I'll be getting rid of my brand new KP 4-link, never opened, if interested.
__________________
1979 c30 3+3 dually 1946 GMC |
04-01-2011, 12:02 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 86
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
I agree. It will have to come with CONTINUAL upgrades (lol). I am still trying to get out of hock after buying the fuel system, electronic boost controller and the Digital 7 plus igniton set-up. Whew!
|
04-01-2011, 12:03 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 86
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
|
04-04-2011, 03:10 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 389
|
Re: Rear Suspension Opinions
__________________
1979 c30 3+3 dually 1946 GMC |
Bookmarks |
|
|