The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-28-2011, 01:16 PM   #1
shortbed70
Registered User
 
shortbed70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Forney TX
Posts: 4,512
Sectioned front crossmember?

What is the reason behind doing this? Do you basically move the entire thing up in the frame rails? Or am I missing something.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Troy

1965 Chevy Bagged,361 sbc,voodoo cam,1.5 full roller rockers,patriot 185cc vortec heads 2.02-1.60,vortec weiand polished intake,demon carb

my truckhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=332884

Big Red Dog build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=572274
shortbed70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011, 01:36 PM   #2
Pop's C-10
Registered User
 
Pop's C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: memphis
Posts: 2,537
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

you missed nothing
__________________
1981 C-10 (Pop's)
1978 Camaro
2006 Lacrosse
Pop's C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011, 01:36 PM   #3
67cheby
67cheby
 
67cheby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: siloam springs ar 72761
Posts: 17,890
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

your factory crossmember is the first thing to touch the ground when you go really low ! and yes it it just moving it up so the frame will go lower and not hit the crossmember !!
67cheby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011, 03:16 PM   #4
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67cheby View Post
your factory crossmember is the first thing to touch the ground when you go really low ! and yes it it just moving it up so the frame will go lower and not hit the crossmember !!
Or.... Get more clearance @ a similar drop. 1" of additional clearance w/6" of front static drop is the difference sometimes between damaged a-arms or not.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2011, 05:03 PM   #5
roofingbloke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: swindon, england
Posts: 290
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

I am just doing a crossmember section (1.25") My static drop was so low, when i came off the gas my crossmember would hit the tarmac, Not good,

Every inch counts when it comes to safety,

I am also going on air,
roofingbloke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2011, 05:22 PM   #6
Slammed50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NW
Posts: 121
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

I know this post is a few months old but is there any info on how much the crossmember needs to be sectioned in order for the center section of the rails to lay out flat? It looks like only a couple inches but am curious if somone has the magic number. I am talking with factory control arms as well. Thanks.
__________________
Check out my build thread for my '63:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...49#post4806049
Slammed50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2011, 05:38 PM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

The limitation will be the steering unless you swap to R&P.

You can only go about 1.5" before the OE style steering tie-rod ends hit the lower control arm u-bolt nuts as the steering swings through its arc. I've also found that what works for 1 application, might be an issue on another (parts combination, year of chassis, clearancing required).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2011, 10:38 PM   #8
oldspowered67C10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cherry Valley,Ca
Posts: 468
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Quick question for anyone who has done this. Did you move the steering box and the idler arm up on the frame also?
oldspowered67C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2011, 10:48 PM   #9
67cheby
67cheby
 
67cheby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: siloam springs ar 72761
Posts: 17,890
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

i havent personally done this but i have read several times that that is the only way to keep your steering geometry correct
67cheby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 12:12 AM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67cheby View Post
i havent personally done this but i have read several times that that is the only way to keep your steering geometry correct
It's a 'catch-22' situation....

The geometry isn't optimum in stock form. Are you making it worse? Possibly. Will it be noticeable? That's subjective. Ask multiple guys that have done a 12" tall spindle b-body disc brake swap to their 10.5" short spindle g-body if they noticed any issues. Some will say yes, others will say no.

I do know that Rob @ No Limit has their R&P set-up that is prob the best answer for the notched x-member guys. He was able to correct many OE & modification flaws so it's worth checking in to.

Different combinations will yield different results (ex: w/stock 1-ton spindles, the tie-rod end seats @ the top of the steering arm; on the dropped spindles, it seats from the bottom). Which one is better? Which one is more correct?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 02:26 PM   #11
Slammed50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NW
Posts: 121
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Minus any steering issues since I will be using a r&p set up anyone have the measurements on how much to section the crossmember so it will lay frame with stock control arms?
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Check out my build thread for my '63:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...49#post4806049
Slammed50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 04:57 PM   #12
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slammed50 View Post
Minus any steering issues since I will be using a r&p set up anyone have the measurements on how much to section the crossmember so it will lay frame with stock control arms?
Have you measured your own set-up? I would start there. Measure from the ground to the bottom of your frame rail & from the ground to the bottom of your control-arm bushing. The difference will be your answer.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 04:58 PM   #13
jimmydean
Registered User
 
jimmydean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 3,728
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

I may be wrong, but I don't think you can lay frame just by sectioning the crossmember. You only get about 1.5" out of it.
__________________
New Project: 1966 LWB C20
Plans:
1/2 ton conversion
Dropmember front
Dropmember rear
Corvette discs
Restored raised bed

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=4295210
jimmydean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 05:01 PM   #14
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmydean View Post
I may be wrong, but I don't think you can lay frame just by sectioning the crossmember. You only get about 1.5" out of it.
The 1.5 is the limit because of OE steering box location....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slammed50
Minus any steering issues since I will be using a r&p set
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 05:31 PM   #15
kev2809
low n' slo
 
kev2809's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: rosenberg, texas
Posts: 5,175
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

which means he can chop the crossmember roughly 3" (like a frame "Z") until the frame lays.

but if your going rack and pinion anyways, would z'ing your frame be easier? you dont have to take anything (motor wise) off in order to do it, just a lot of boxing...

i havent done either so im just speaking of hear say!
__________________
67 1/2 ton Suburban - Project DRGNWGN. Build thread

-_--_--_ _________
_--_-_ -/____|__|__\__
,.,,,.,.,,.,|_O _______ O_]
kev2809 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 06:20 PM   #16
jimmydean
Registered User
 
jimmydean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 3,728
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
The 1.5 is the limit because of OE steering box location....
Ah, even so I didn't think you could get 3"+ out of it. Hence the preface "I may be wrong" since I usually am.

Sectioned crossmembers and z'ed frames seem like way too much work to save very little over the various options available now (Porterbuilt, NoLimit, Scotts).
__________________
New Project: 1966 LWB C20
Plans:
1/2 ton conversion
Dropmember front
Dropmember rear
Corvette discs
Restored raised bed

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=4295210
jimmydean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2011, 06:34 PM   #17
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kev2809 View Post
which means he can chop the crossmember roughly 3" (like a frame "Z") until the frame lays.

but if your going rack and pinion anyways, would z'ing your frame be easier? you dont have to take anything (motor wise) off in order to do it, just a lot of boxing...

i havent done either so im just speaking of hear say!
No Limits R&P set-up is affordable vs. other R&P kit alternatives & doesn't required welding. The x-member can be removed & easily carried to a welder/shop in a small car for the notch if a guy doesn't have a welder or welding experience. It also isn't as critical from a strength perspective for the novice welder since technically half of the bolts that secure/locate the unit remain on the un-modified side of the x-member vs. cutting off & re-attaching the front clip correctly/successfully.

If a guy was trying for more than 1.5" of drop/travel gain, a Dropmember (or similar dropped crossmember alternative) would be the better alternative vs. the x-member notch.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 12:03 PM   #18
Slammed50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NW
Posts: 121
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Thanks for the info scoti, I am in the process of building my suspension now so as soon as in all comes back from the sand blaster I will be able to get a better idea of how much I need to section it. It doesn't look like I need to go as much as 3" but I will find out in a couple weeks. I'll keep you posted.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Check out my build thread for my '63:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...49#post4806049
Slammed50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 12:06 PM   #19
Slammed50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NW
Posts: 121
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Kev, I am tryin to avoid a z'ed frame if at some point I want to change up the front suspension. If I section the crossmember all I have to do pull the bolts and I'm ready to go.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Check out my build thread for my '63:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...49#post4806049
Slammed50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 01:10 PM   #20
dv8customs
Registered User
 
dv8customs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,047
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

There is not enough material there to section the crossmember 3". In order to fully lay out with a stock crossmember you will need to Z it some.
dv8customs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 02:19 PM   #21
jimmydean
Registered User
 
jimmydean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 3,728
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dv8customs View Post
There is not enough material there to section the crossmember 3". In order to fully lay out with a stock crossmember you will need to Z it some.
That's what I thought. I didn't think you could get much over 2.25" max and even getting that much would be a lot of work.

I understand what you are wanting to do. I think Scoti is right on the nose with the No Limit rack setup as a best option if you didn't want to go full on DM.
__________________
New Project: 1966 LWB C20
Plans:
1/2 ton conversion
Dropmember front
Dropmember rear
Corvette discs
Restored raised bed

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=4295210
jimmydean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 10:53 AM   #22
Slammed50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NW
Posts: 121
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Guess I need to take another look at it and see what my next step will be then. Don't really have the cash to drop on a DM as much as I would like to. Brainstorming time....
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Check out my build thread for my '63:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...49#post4806049
Slammed50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 11:32 AM   #23
LUCKIN-FOU
I'M NOT SCARED I HAVE A PLASMA
 
LUCKIN-FOU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The PLACE
Posts: 172
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

1] Here are some pictures of a cross member that I did a couple of years ago. I took 2.25 inches out of the middle. I did it on one of my trucks I never finished it because it’s mine. I had to get to work on a paying job.

I made sure it was level. This way when I welded some legs on it when I put it back together it was true and square.









All I did was find the center mark it with 2” tape and make some lines. I went with 2 inches because I didn’t need a bunch of clearance.





__________________
Lou Santiago
US Navy Retired/World Traveler
Car Builder/Welder/Airport Investigator
garageinsidertv.com [FORUM]

WORK IS FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN'T FISH. I GUESS I'M SCREWED BECAUSED I HATE FISHING.
LUCKIN-FOU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 03:10 PM   #24
Slammed50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Albuquerque, NW
Posts: 121
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

Looks like a nice job Lou but the section needs to be horizontally not vertically to make it sit lower. Thanks for the pics though!!
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Check out my build thread for my '63:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...49#post4806049
Slammed50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 12:51 AM   #25
LUCKIN-FOU
I'M NOT SCARED I HAVE A PLASMA
 
LUCKIN-FOU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The PLACE
Posts: 172
Re: Sectioned front crossmember?

I'll post some of them
__________________
Lou Santiago
US Navy Retired/World Traveler
Car Builder/Welder/Airport Investigator
garageinsidertv.com [FORUM]

WORK IS FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN'T FISH. I GUESS I'M SCREWED BECAUSED I HATE FISHING.
LUCKIN-FOU is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com