09-04-2012, 10:25 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,011
|
4.8 Vs 5.3 mpg
What is the difference in the fuel mileage between the 4.8 and 5.3? I found a place that sells complete change outs, dont know how much yet, and just wondering the difference. I know the 5.3 makes more power but Im more into mileage as i use my truck as my daily driver and I gaurantee the 4.8 makes better power than my carbed 305.
__________________
Anthony |
09-05-2012, 12:46 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Coast California
Posts: 1,026
|
Re: 4.8 Vs 5.3 mpg
All the research I did showed that they were pretty darn close to each other...perhaps 1-2 mpg better with the 4.8L IF you were lucky. (most said they were equivocal.)
I was trying to decide between them for a daily driver build and decided on the 5.3L. I think because of what was available at the time, the added power compared to mpg, resell would be better with a 5.3, and I think because a 6.0 upgrade wouldn't need a reprogram because of the same stoke length with the 5.3L (don't quote me on this one)... blah, blah, blah But, yes, had a 4.8L been presented to me at the time I would have bought it.
__________________
1972 K20 Suburban 5.7/700r4/NP205 Dana 44/H052 Sold 1972 C10 5.3L/4L60E 12bolt 5Lug - Sold 1971 K5 Blazer 6.0L LQ9 4L60E NP205 Dana 44/H052!!! 1970 K3500 1ton CrewCab 8.1L/Allison1000/NP205 Dana 60/14B!!!! - Sold 1984 K10 SWB 7.4L/4L80e/NP208 Corp 10/12 bolt Sold 1988 V30 CCLB 7.4L/TH400/NP205/Dana 60/Dana 70/3.73!!! (Sold) 2003 K2500HD 8.1/Allison1000/NP263 |
09-05-2012, 12:49 AM | #3 |
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
|
Re: 4.8 Vs 5.3 mpg
Just go 5.3, mileage difference will be negligible but the difference in power is noticeable. If you want the mileage run it with an o/d trans and a long enough rear gear. Since it needs to have vats and the other misc stuff tuned out when you do the swap, having a tuner use something like HP Tuners and doing a mileage-oriented tune isn't a bad idea.
There are plenty of folks with near stock (and modded) 5.3/od trans combos seeing north of 20-22 and over while locked up on the freeway @ 65
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
|
09-06-2012, 01:26 AM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 1,913
|
Re: 4.8 Vs 5.3 mpg
Quote:
__________________
Custom Painter/Restoration Specialist 1965 GMC 3/4 Ton LB SOLD? 1964 Chevy El Camino in full restoration 1991 Chevy S10 288K+ miles 2nd Owner SOLD 2020 RAM 1500 Warlock |
|
09-06-2012, 01:36 AM | #5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carmichael, California
Posts: 3,011
|
Re: 4.8 Vs 5.3 mpg
Quote:
The bed is clean and I dont think the other stuff is going to make a significant difference in mileage. Maybe a bed cover but other than that I dont think its worth the effort and money for little or no gain in economy. I get 15-16mpg with my carbed 305/700R4 set up and figure Ill get closer to 20mpg when I swap. Need to start making a list of what all I need. Going to try to do it as cheap as possible with the only "custom" parts being the motor mount adaptors.
__________________
Anthony |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|