The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2012, 10:36 AM   #1
skidpan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Barstow Ca
Posts: 53
60-62 lower ball joints vs 63+ ball joints

I'm in the middle of mocking up my front end before disassembly for final paint, and I've ran into a situation. I've boxed my stock 60 torsion lower arms for bags, and removed the bump stop brace. As any one who has pulled the early lowers knows, the ball joint has two bolts to the arm, and one to the bump stop. I'm going to be using other means for a bump stop.
It would be ashame to clutter up the work I've done to the arms, and build a brace got the lower ball joint. Is the taper of the later style the same as my early. And would it be feasible to just drill a couple holes to bolt in the later ball joint, it being more readily available, not to mention more affordable?
Posted via Mobile Device
skidpan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 11:23 AM   #2
luvbowties
Registered User
 
luvbowties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
Question Re: 60-63 lower ball joints vs 64+ ball joints

Cannot answer your question; however if you go to Advance Auto Parts website & compare pictures of the '64-up lower b-j to the pics of yours, you will see the '64-up is not held in w/bolts, but just pressed in. No way to bolt it in that is readily apparent from comparing the 2 pics. HTH.
sam
luvbowties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 04:21 PM   #3
64fleetside
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: arkieland
Posts: 1,070
Re: 60-63 lower ball joints vs 64+ ball joints

The 60-62 ball joints are totally different than 63-70.
64fleetside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 05:58 PM   #4
skidpan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Barstow Ca
Posts: 53
Re: 60-63 lower ball joints vs 64+ ball joints

Quote:
Originally Posted by 64fleetside View Post
The 60-62 ball joints are totally different than 63-70.
Wow... Did you read the original post? I am aware that the joints aren't the same, that is the reason for the question... I wasn't aware, but thanks to luvbowtie stated that the newer joints are pressed in, not bolted in. I will have to figure something else out. Thanks luvbowtie, I appreaciate the response .
Posted via Mobile Device
skidpan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 07:23 PM   #5
64fleetside
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: arkieland
Posts: 1,070
Re: 60-63 lower ball joints vs 64+ ball joints

Yeah, I read it, and the two types are so far apart that they won't interchange-there's no way to drill a pressed in ball joint-there's nothing to drill into. You've obviously never looked at the two types of ball joints nor the control arms.
64fleetside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 10:22 AM   #6
ChiefRocka
Hollister, CA.
 
ChiefRocka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hollister, Ca.
Posts: 6,150
Re: 60-63 lower ball joints vs 64+ ball joints

(title corrected)


If your set on using your early crossmember/arms, then get some DOM and fab up ur own weld in bungs to accept later BJ's.....
-
-
__________________
John

What the Heck is that ??

CURRENT BUILDS:
62 BurbMaster

Other Builds:
My '63 C-10,LWB,CC,BBW
'06 HD StrAight Axle Swap

Father/Son '67 C-20, LQ9,4L80,Bagged,8-Lugger !!Good Friend Richard's Build

AMERICAN CUSTOMS & CLASSICS (831) 630-1965
www.ACCHOLLISTER.com
ACC on FACEBOOK
"Rest in Peace, Mom & Dad ... I will see you again someday!"
ChiefRocka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2014, 01:55 AM   #7
LostMy65
But Found Her 25yrs Later!
 
LostMy65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 10,530
Re: 60-63 lower ball joints vs 64+ ball joints

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefRocka View Post
(title corrected)


If your set on using your early crossmember/arms, then get some DOM and fab up ur own weld in bungs to accept later BJ's.....
-
-
I've been trying to find what size DOM is needed for 73-86 balljoints.
__________________
I lost my 65 - Found it 25 years later:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=426650

66 C20 Service Truck:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=428035
LostMy65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2014, 11:18 AM   #8
LVPhotos
Registered User
 
LVPhotos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,857
Re: 60-62 lower ball joints vs 63+ ball joints

Digging up bones! My PB arms are 2" id and 2.75 " od for 73up ball joint.
__________________
1962 shortbed 408cui small block, TKO 600 5-speed, bagged Porterbuilt suspension. 18" Salt Flats
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/332579...t-c-k-pick-up/
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=560081
LVPhotos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2014, 11:30 AM   #9
LostMy65
But Found Her 25yrs Later!
 
LostMy65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 10,530
Re: 60-62 lower ball joints vs 63+ ball joints

Thanks.
I like to post in existing threads so information is consolidated rather than having 10 threads on the same topic.
__________________
I lost my 65 - Found it 25 years later:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=426650

66 C20 Service Truck:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=428035
LostMy65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2014, 10:26 PM   #10
s11sean11
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: winnipeg Manitoba
Posts: 167
Re: 60-62 lower ball joints vs 63+ ball joints

I did the same thing I boxed the arms but I kept the original ball joints but this sounds like a good way to go if you can make it work
s11sean11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2014, 11:33 PM   #11
LVPhotos
Registered User
 
LVPhotos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,857
Re: 60-62 lower ball joints vs 63+ ball joints

Old school minis had torsion bars. I remember some did bag over bar. I think I have a picture of 57 truck with bag on top arm. Took it for ???? Factor.
__________________
1962 shortbed 408cui small block, TKO 600 5-speed, bagged Porterbuilt suspension. 18" Salt Flats
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/332579...t-c-k-pick-up/
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=560081
LVPhotos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 02:36 PM   #12
LostMy65
But Found Her 25yrs Later!
 
LostMy65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 10,530
Re: 60-62 lower ball joints vs 63+ ball joints

I don't see why someone couldn't fab up something like the end of this 73-87 lower arm that would bolt in just like the lower 60-62 ball joints.

__________________
I lost my 65 - Found it 25 years later:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=426650

66 C20 Service Truck:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=428035
LostMy65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2015, 03:31 PM   #13
LostMy65
But Found Her 25yrs Later!
 
LostMy65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 10,530
Re: 60-62 lower ball joints vs 63+ ball joints

Or maybe the end of the 73-87 lower control arm can be cut off and then bolted to the 60-62 lower arm.
__________________
I lost my 65 - Found it 25 years later:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=426650

66 C20 Service Truck:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=428035
LostMy65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com