The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2013, 09:16 PM   #1
Realnoisy
Registered User
 
Realnoisy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 229
3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Okay, I'm getting ready to "Z" my frame. I have 2.5 dropped spindles, 1.5 pancake xmember with bags. Aired out, I'm about 1/2 inch from laying xmember. It's very hard to hold a tape measure and take a photo but you get the idea in the second photo. As you can see I'm about 3.5 inches from laying frame. I'd just like some opinions whether to go all the way to 3.5 or just go with 3 inches?
Attached Images
  
Realnoisy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 09:27 PM   #2
ol_skool_chevy
Registered User
 
ol_skool_chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
Posts: 1,300
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

the more you go the more you will have to tunnel your cab....there now alot of room for the trans
__________________
Measure with a yard stick
Mark with Chalk
Cut with a torch



Built it yourself, don't count on others to to do it for you or with you. It will never get done
ol_skool_chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 10:27 PM   #3
Realnoisy
Registered User
 
Realnoisy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 229
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ol_skool_chevy View Post
the more you go the more you will have to tunnel your cab....there now alot of room for the trans
Thanks ol_skool_chevy! I'll be installing a T5. You think there be be tunneling required with a 3 inch "Z"?
Realnoisy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 10:30 PM   #4
ol_skool_chevy
Registered User
 
ol_skool_chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon 97123
Posts: 1,300
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

I have never done one....but i know theres not alot of room...maybe search this site "Z frame..theres some here that do it...if it was me. so not I would go no more then 2 1/2 "
__________________
Measure with a yard stick
Mark with Chalk
Cut with a torch



Built it yourself, don't count on others to to do it for you or with you. It will never get done
ol_skool_chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 08:17 PM   #5
Bomp
Registered User
 
Bomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: .
Posts: 3,104
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Some people have moved their motors forward an inch and tilt the motor slightly so that the tunnel isn't so affected. Then you have a lot less to modify on the floor.
Bomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 08:31 PM   #6
Realnoisy
Registered User
 
Realnoisy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 229
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bomp View Post
Some people have moved their motors forward an inch and tilt the motor slightly so that the tunnel isn't so affected. Then you have a lot less to modify on the floor.
Thanks Bomp! I plan on moving my motor forward from the I6 position to the V8 position for HEI clearance and T5 shifter position, that's about 3 inches forward. Are you saying another inch forward from the V8 position?

Also a strange thing, I Z'd 3 inches (vertical) last weekend and she looks great but when I mounted my horns, I set my front clip in for good measure. I tacked the horns in place and they are well over a 3 inch drop maybe 4 or 5 inches lower. When I lay out, the horns lay with the frame evenly. It's got me scratching my head. All my fender to door, hood to fender line up and have straight lines....ever seen this? I'll post photos next weekend.
Realnoisy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 01:11 PM   #7
Bomp
Registered User
 
Bomp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: .
Posts: 3,104
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Realnoisy View Post
Thanks Bomp! I plan on moving my motor forward from the I6 position to the V8 position for HEI clearance and T5 shifter position, that's about 3 inches forward. Are you saying another inch forward from the V8 position?

Also a strange thing, I Z'd 3 inches (vertical) last weekend and she looks great but when I mounted my horns, I set my front clip in for good measure. I tacked the horns in place and they are well over a 3 inch drop maybe 4 or 5 inches lower. When I lay out, the horns lay with the frame evenly. It's got me scratching my head. All my fender to door, hood to fender line up and have straight lines....ever seen this? I'll post photos next weekend.

I haven't experienced that myself but I think I go about things way different than most.
I hang the fenders and place the mounts according to where needed and measure. or vicea versa
Bomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 03:08 PM   #8
chevyrestoguy
Registered User
 
chevyrestoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: apple valley, ca
Posts: 2,670
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

3"/3.5" is a bunch of "Z", and you might have issues in a few areas. If you're planning to use the stock steering box in the stock location, your steering shaft is going to hit the top of the driver's side control arm. The steering linkage might get a little weird, too. The idler arm may not be long enough to secure to the passenger side framerail because it's now 3" to 3.5" higher than normal. If you're not running the high hump cab, you're going to hit on the transmission, and you'll need to build a new tunnel. You're going to need to build another trans crossmember, or space your current crossmember up a whole bunch. You'll have to keep an eye on your driveshaft angle and space up the carrier bearing. I'm not sure, but you might be real close on the brake booster and the heater box if you try to get the valve covers off. You'll also have to get creative on the front sway bar. The stock front sway bar brackets on the frame are too low in relation to the 3"/3.5" height change of the lower control arm attach point, and the sway bar will be at a downward tilt and won't be in it's optimal location.

After a lot of figuring, we decided that a 2" Z gave me the extra crossmember clearance without a whole lot of hassle. I will have to put a very small c-section in the upper control arm for steering shaft clearance. I had to redrill one new hole in my idler arm so it would bolt up. I removed the front sway bar hangers and bolted the mount saddles directly to the frame. I have a high hump cab, and I have plenty of trans clearance. I had to build 2" spacers on my trans crossmember and I also built a shim for the carrier bearing to get the pinion angle back to stock. With a 2" Z, you can still use the stock inner fenders if you trim the bottoms.

If you decide to Z the frame, make sure you move the whole assembly forward 1" at the same time to center the wheels in the wheel openings. The farther you lower a 60-66, the more the wheels move back in the wheel openings. A 1" change in the wheelbase makes a huge difference in appearance.

Z'ing a chassis gives you a lot of great features for hardly any money at all. In this case, more is not always better. You can send yourself down a rabbit hole where you wind up modifying everything, and it may get to a point where you regret your decision.

If your ultimate goal is to lay frame, you might want to consider that the rockers and bedsides hang way lower than the frame. If the body hits the ground first, then laying frame is a moot point.
__________________
Check out my latest endeavor:
https://roundsixpod.com

My build threads:
'55 Chevy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=247512

'64 C-20: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=446527

Last edited by chevyrestoguy; 03-10-2013 at 03:18 PM.
chevyrestoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 06:14 PM   #9
Realnoisy
Registered User
 
Realnoisy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 229
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevyrestoguy View Post
3"/3.5" is a bunch of "Z", and you might have issues in a few areas. If you're planning to use the stock steering box in the stock location, your steering shaft is going to hit the top of the driver's side control arm. The steering linkage might get a little weird, too. The idler arm may not be long enough to secure to the passenger side framerail because it's now 3" to 3.5" higher than normal. If you're not running the high hump cab, you're going to hit on the transmission, and you'll need to build a new tunnel. You're going to need to build another trans crossmember, or space your current crossmember up a whole bunch. You'll have to keep an eye on your driveshaft angle and space up the carrier bearing. I'm not sure, but you might be real close on the brake booster and the heater box if you try to get the valve covers off. You'll also have to get creative on the front sway bar. The stock front sway bar brackets on the frame are too low in relation to the 3"/3.5" height change of the lower control arm attach point, and the sway bar will be at a downward tilt and won't be in it's optimal location.

After a lot of figuring, we decided that a 2" Z gave me the extra crossmember clearance without a whole lot of hassle. I will have to put a very small c-section in the upper control arm for steering shaft clearance. I had to redrill one new hole in my idler arm so it would bolt up. I removed the front sway bar hangers and bolted the mount saddles directly to the frame. I have a high hump cab, and I have plenty of trans clearance. I had to build 2" spacers on my trans crossmember and I also built a shim for the carrier bearing to get the pinion angle back to stock. With a 2" Z, you can still use the stock inner fenders if you trim the bottoms.

If you decide to Z the frame, make sure you move the whole assembly forward 1" at the same time to center the wheels in the wheel openings. The farther you lower a 60-66, the more the wheels move back in the wheel openings. A 1" change in the wheelbase makes a huge difference in appearance.

Z'ing a chassis gives you a lot of great features for hardly any money at all. In this case, more is not always better. You can send yourself down a rabbit hole where you wind up modifying everything, and it may get to a point where you regret your decision.

If your ultimate goal is to lay frame, you might want to consider that the rockers and bedsides hang way lower than the frame. If the body hits the ground first, then laying frame is a moot point.
I went with a 3" Z. So far, everything you describe plus...hood lip clearance on tires when closing hood...which means you'll have to narrow the track, or trim your hood lip, or have some serious negative camber. Also, if you're running a manual transmission, your clutch pivot z bar will have to be addressed. I already moved my xmember up the rails 1 inch to center the wheels so I just made a vertical cut. The radiator will have to be addressed. I use knuckle joints for steering to clear the drivers side upper control arm instead of notching the UCA. I just went outside and looked at my valve covers, I should have no trouble taking them off, but I'm very close to the brake booster as you have pointed out and I'm not running a heater box. I moved the engine to the V8 position and now have some good dizzy clearance. I've already purchased a high hump and will be addressing all that you have described. When I air out, my frame barely touches the ground. This is with 1.5 pancaked xmember (all the steering linkage, steering box, idler arm and centering in the wells were addressed at this time with the pancake) and 2.5 dropped spindles with bag cups trimmed to 1.5. Before I forget, you will have to remove the stock bell housing xmember because it hangs low and will hit first preventing you from laying frame.

I just installed the engine and trans (T5) today. I had to remove the ebrake linkage on the ebrake xmember to slip it in. In the next few weekends I'll be addressing the low hump and trans xmember and front sway bar.

I'm sure PB will get a plug on this thread by someone and that's okay but I prefer to build a "glue together" instead of a "snap together" model. I enjoy the build so far even though sometimes it feels like it will never end. It's a journey of meeting people, searching for parts, using engineering and mechanical skills. So far, it keeps me of the streets....literally!
__________________
A spirit with a vision is a dream with a mission - Neil Peart RUSH

Last edited by Realnoisy; 03-10-2013 at 06:19 PM.
Realnoisy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 09:02 PM   #10
chevyrestoguy
Registered User
 
chevyrestoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: apple valley, ca
Posts: 2,670
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Realnoisy View Post
I went with a 3" Z. So far, everything you describe plus...hood lip clearance on tires when closing hood...which means you'll have to narrow the track, or trim your hood lip, or have some serious negative camber. Also, if you're running a manual transmission, your clutch pivot z bar will have to be addressed. I already moved my xmember up the rails 1 inch to center the wheels so I just made a vertical cut. The radiator will have to be addressed. I use knuckle joints for steering to clear the drivers side upper control arm instead of notching the UCA. I just went outside and looked at my valve covers, I should have no trouble taking them off, but I'm very close to the brake booster as you have pointed out and I'm not running a heater box. I moved the engine to the V8 position and now have some good dizzy clearance. I've already purchased a high hump and will be addressing all that you have described. When I air out, my frame barely touches the ground. This is with 1.5 pancaked xmember (all the steering linkage, steering box, idler arm and centering in the wells were addressed at this time with the pancake) and 2.5 dropped spindles with bag cups trimmed to 1.5. Before I forget, you will have to remove the stock bell housing xmember because it hangs low and will hit first preventing you from laying frame.

I just installed the engine and trans (T5) today. I had to remove the ebrake linkage on the ebrake xmember to slip it in. In the next few weekends I'll be addressing the low hump and trans xmember and front sway bar.

I'm sure PB will get a plug on this thread by someone and that's okay but I prefer to build a "glue together" instead of a "snap together" model. I enjoy the build so far even though sometimes it feels like it will never end. It's a journey of meeting people, searching for parts, using engineering and mechanical skills. So far, it keeps me of the streets....literally!
Wow, you have done your homework! I am impressed. You have given this mod some real thought. I'm definitely tuning in on this build!

I COMPLETELY agree with your last paragraph. Don't get me wrong...I love Nathan Porter's stuff, and if I was building a high-end vehicle, I would use his parts. I've always been a guy who would rather crawl through a wrecking yard or hit the swapmeets to build my vehicles. I love making things work out of parts that most people don't give a second glance. If I see an article on how to build something for $500, my brain starts spinning and I'll figure out how to build something even nicer for $200. It's the way I'm wired. I've tried to keep that same theme during the build-up of my '64, and it has been one of the most fun projects I have ever done.
__________________
Check out my latest endeavor:
https://roundsixpod.com

My build threads:
'55 Chevy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=247512

'64 C-20: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=446527
chevyrestoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 08:19 AM   #11
brokenspoke
Registered User
 
brokenspoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Anderson, Texas
Posts: 535
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Are the tires in your pic the ones your gonna run? Maybe a lower profile tire?
brokenspoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 08:48 AM   #12
Realnoisy
Registered User
 
Realnoisy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 229
Re: 3 inch "Z" or 3.5 inch?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brokenspoke View Post
Are the tires in your pic the ones your gonna run? Maybe a lower profile tire?
Oh now you are gonna' throw that into the mix...lol! I have to admit, I haven't even thought about a lower profile tire. If I did go with a lower profile tire, I will probably lay real hard but it would give me the hood clearance and the option to lay rocker. Hmmm!
__________________
A spirit with a vision is a dream with a mission - Neil Peart RUSH
Realnoisy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com