Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-01-2013, 03:28 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
|
Rubber or Urethane???????
I need to be ordering cab mounts and trailing arm bushings (hence this is in the suspension forum) soon.
My set up in the front will be 2.5" drop spindles and 2" drop springs (otherwise stock setup), and my rear suspension will be a porterbuilt stage one bag kit with porterbuilt adjustable trac bar. No notch in back, bags are just to adjust ride height if towing, or carrying a load. Should be running around equivalent to a 3" or 4" drop. I am inclined to order the urethane kits, but would be interested in hear opinions from you guys who have used one, the other, or both.
__________________
Craigerrr My build thread, CRGRS 66 Winter Build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...09#post5638709 |
03-01-2013, 03:55 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,640
|
Re: Rubber or Urethane???????
I like urethane because of its stiffness, but I never had trailing arm suspension. I have only used them in A-arm/leaf suspension.
|
03-01-2013, 07:37 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,082
|
Re: Rubber or Urethane???????
For the truck arm front bushings, I'd use them. For cab mounts, I'd use rubber. I don't see the need for poly as a body mount.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
03-01-2013, 08:04 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 934
|
Re: Rubber or Urethane???????
From a handling stand point the urethane body mounts are supposed to tie the frame and chassis together and make it a stronger unit. It also is a more firm ride than rubber. For the trailing arms urethane stiffens up the joints and limits deflection of the joint, according to No Limit Engineering the only thing that should be rubber is the trailing arm mounts so there is less binding at that pivot point and everything else should be urethane for rigidity.
I have urethane cab mounts and didnt notice much difference in ride and I also have urethane trailing arm mounts and I think they are just fine, they certainly will last longer than the rubber will in that joint!
__________________
69 GMC C10 build thread- http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=501676 03 Silverado build thread-http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=591582 |
03-01-2013, 10:35 PM | #5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,082
|
Re: Rubber or Urethane???????
Quote:
I agree the poly cab mounts will last longer. But, if you're not seeking a roller coaster type cornering experience, the rubbers will last years & are easy enough to replace should you keep your truck another 20+ years on the road. I would think the main downfall of them isn't so much a worse ride, but increased noise/vibration levels if the truck has the pre-73 type rubber-bushed metal sleeve trype a-arm bushings. Interestingly... my buddy recently priced some Moog a-arm bushings & rubber body mounts @ the local auto parts place only to find the poly stuff available @ a pretty decent reduction in cost from Summit. If it's cheaper to do poly, they're the way to go.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|