The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2013, 09:50 AM   #1
OKGMC4
Registered User
 
OKGMC4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 1,245
Understanding GM ecu operation?

Anyone that is familiar with tuning may know...

Is a cold air intake worth the effort? I know in theory cold air is more dense, makes more power, blah blah...but when you google it you come up with conflicting answers. There seems to be an assumed general rule on several threads of a loss of 1% power for an increase of 11 degrees temp at inlet air temp (not counting humidity, air pressure, etc.) But that means on a 300 hp engine you only lose 12 hp when air temp goes up 44 degrees, which seems like a small amount. So...

1.Does the engine actually lose more than that when the MAF registers higher temps? Does the engine pull timing at that point at higher IATs?

I have an air filter right above the engine in a custom box I built and I drove around last night with my OBDII scanner hooked up and watched it. At 55 degrees, when the engine warmed up I read 80-85 IAT moving, and up to 100 degrees sitting still. That would mean I could be losing that 12 or so hp, but you can't feel it on the inaccurate butt dyno. I wondered if I unplugged the MAF so the ecm had no clue what the IAT was and forced speed density mode, would I sense a difference. I did that and drove some more. Absolutely no difference anywhere could be felt. OK, so if it runs the same why do I even need a MAF? I thought it was supposed to help the engine adjust and run right but at the same time I know many people get mafless tunes, so why? I have also read that cold air intakes don't work without a custom tune because the ecm sees the cooler air and adjusts to attain the same air fuel ratio it had before the intake. So...

3. Is it better to run with a MAF or without?
4. Is it true that even something as simple as an air intake could require adjustment?

Also, in the 30 minutes I drove with no MAF plugged in, I recieved no check engine light. Shouldn't that have set off an alarm?

Sorry so long, you just get a ton of conflicting info on the net and it seems like someone who has done any tuning with an LS would know this. I would love to get HPTuners and tune my 5.3, but I don't know jack about the VE charts, or short or long term fuel trims, etc, and I'm afraid to blow things up.
__________________
56 GMC BUILD THREAD:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=368649

69 long bed Chevy turned 67 gmc jimmy roadster:
https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=851167
OKGMC4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 02:32 PM   #2
68GMCCustom
Truck and auto performance nut
 
68GMCCustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
Re: Understanding GM ecu operation?

My guess is you were not to a point that it would make a huge difference. Had the IAT been another 50* higher you probably would have.

Not sure how to answer (not familiar with SD tunes or MAF for that matter - just beginning)....so I took a screen shot of one of the stock files from my TrailBlazerSS...as you can see the higher the temp goes...the more timing the ecm pulls.

__________________
Kurt -

'68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy
'72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close
'06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD
'18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver
'95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto...

my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken
A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken
68GMCCustom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2013, 04:44 PM   #3
BR3W CITY
meowMEOWmeowMEOW
 
BR3W CITY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: MKE WI
Posts: 7,128
Re: Understanding GM ecu operation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by OKGMC4 View Post
Anyone that is familiar with tuning may know...


3. Is it better to run with a MAF or without?

IMO on anything besides a higher power forced induction setup, there isn't much of a reason to run without it (speed density tune). When you start to go past the ability of the MAF and make multiple atmospheres, the SD tune is needed. It allows you to develop the "most" power under the circumstances under which it was tuned....this means that tuning a car for the most power in WI might yield drastically different results in southern AL where the temp and density is going to be drastically different, because you've removed the piece of equipment that used to make the adjusments. Just unplugging the MAF on your regular non-sd tune won't improve anything.
4. Is it true that even something as simple as an air intake could require adjustment?


Theoretically if you were building vehicles to just dyno for max power, yes it could need a change, but realistically that isn't really the case. The changes from a cai are well within the ability of the MAF and PCM to compensate with fuel and timing. [/COLOR]

Also, in the 30 minutes I drove with no MAF plugged in, I recieved no check engine light. Shouldn't that have set off an alarm?

My CEL light didn't work when I first did my swap....you never get a CEL if the light doesn't work
meow in italic red
__________________
'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING

MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD
BR3W CITY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2013, 10:47 AM   #4
Wasted Income
Boosted Member
 
Wasted Income's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Mackinaw, IL
Posts: 2,200
Re: Understanding GM ecu operation?

I don't run ANYTHING except open loop, speed density on my swaps. Boost, or N/A.

First thing I do it take the MAF and throw it in the trash, lol.
__________________
1972 2wd K/5 Blazer Turbocharged 370 LSx - 941 rwhp / 1093 rwtq
1969 Chevy K-10 L33 5.3 / 4L80E / NP241 / 4" lift
1964 Buick Skylark Twin TURBO 383 LS pro-touring project
2014 VW Passat TDI - Daily Driver
Turbo diesel
2015 Sierra Denali HD Duramax Turbo diesel
2023 Ford Explorer ST - Twin Turbskis
2023 Ford F150 RCSB - Whipple Supercharged
2017 Polaris RZR Turbo
2014 Nor-Tech Center Console - Twin Supercharged Outboards

TURBO ALL THE THINGS!!
Wasted Income is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com