12-05-2014, 01:46 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hampstead North Carolina
Posts: 25
|
I'd frame
Help I'd frame under sons 64 C10 body If more pic will let me know His C10 64 body is attached to this frame I am trying do som up grades on brakes I was told it was a 64 impala a and then a chevelle
Last edited by Cptmorg@msn.com; 12-05-2014 at 01:52 AM. |
12-05-2014, 02:02 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
|
Re: I'd frame
monte carlo 78-87
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation if there is a problem, I can have it. new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393 |
12-05-2014, 02:55 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 1,913
|
Re: I'd frame
Its an A Body frame because if I remember right the upper arms are different on an Impala. So it could be 64-67 or 68-72 depending on the rearend width.
__________________
Custom Painter/Restoration Specialist 1965 GMC 3/4 Ton LB SOLD? 1964 Chevy El Camino in full restoration 1991 Chevy S10 288K+ miles 2nd Owner SOLD 2020 RAM 1500 Warlock |
12-05-2014, 10:26 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Hampstead North Carolina
Posts: 25
|
Re: I'd frame
Will a pic of the rear brake help the ID process ?
|
12-05-2014, 12:26 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
|
Re: I'd frame
hmm I retract my monte carlo statement. the shock mounts are in the wrong spot. looks almost like a late model caprice frame by those shock mount locations but the late late frames use a pin mount and those are bushing mount.
shock mounts are at the rear on an a body too. I think it may be an "early late" model caprice/impala, like a 78-90
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation if there is a problem, I can have it. new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393 |
Bookmarks |
|
|