The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-27-2014, 07:25 PM   #1
sneakyfast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: charlotte NC
Posts: 63
exhaust opinions

Ok gents I have a 73 with a 383 stroker that the Po has a 3 inch running that dumps right behind the cab and is loud enough to rattle your fillings lose. I'm considering running 2.5 if it doesn't kill my power. Its a daily driver so

1. Will I notice a power rob? Ive seen some opinions say I shouldn't notice a difference until the motor is running 500hp but that doesn't sound right
2. The Po also is running full length headers, should I change these to shorties at the same time or does it make no difference?
3. I used to love the sound of flowmasters but they have a bewildering number of choices in 2.5 inch. Any recommendations?
4. He has a 950 cfm crab which seems huge to me but will I need to change that out to?

Thanks guys and when you reply lets pretend I was raised in a public school and have been out of cars for many years
sneakyfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2014, 08:26 PM   #2
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: exhaust opinions

When I built my first 383 stroker engine for my 84 GMC, I spent some time talking to different exhaust system manufacturers and system dealers. This is not the local pipe benders, but the guys that make and sell Flowmaster and Magnaflow systems. I came to one common thing from all of them, there is such a thing as too much on exhaust. I am now on a second stroker engine, due to throwing a rod out of the first one at well over the measured 80 MPH on the speedo. It was our fault for using that brand of rods, not something else going wrong.

The systems have to be large enough to flow easily, but small enough to allow for the exhaust fumes to cool efficiently and create a negative pressure effect to help remove the gasses from the cylinders. Otherwise you could have a lazy exhaust flow and cause yourself more pain than gain. For my SWB truck a set of 2 1/2" dual exhaust pipes from my headers would provide the most optimum flow and not cause any reversionary effects.

I have a set of headers with 3" collectors that go to dual 2 1/2" pipes going back to an "H" pipe crossover and then into two Magnaflow stainless mufflers and then into pipes that are 2 1/2" pipes to the rear roll pan. I used to run Flowmaster but after having to replace the mufflers twice for rusting out, I went to the Magnaflow stainless mufflers.

According to most of the techs at the manufacturers, the 3" exhaust system would work great for a really large engine with a lot of assistance on the air intake, to make it work properly. Your street driven truck with a SBC will work very well with the 2 1/2" piping.
__________________
Frank
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2014, 08:27 PM   #3
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: exhaust opinions

Unless your dragging the headers i would keep them on it,A full length header flows better then a shorty header.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2014, 08:57 PM   #4
sneakyfast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: charlotte NC
Posts: 63
Re: exhaust opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by piecesparts View Post
When I built my first 383 stroker engine for my 84 GMC, I spent some time talking to different exhaust system manufacturers and system dealers. This is not the local pipe benders, but the guys that make and sell Flowmaster and Magnaflow systems. I came to one common thing from all of them, there is such a thing as too much on exhaust. I am now on a second stroker engine, due to throwing a rod out of the first one at well over the measured 80 MPH on the speedo. It was our fault for using that brand of rods, not something else going wrong.

The systems have to be large enough to flow easily, but small enough to allow for the exhaust fumes to cool efficiently and create a negative pressure effect to help remove the gasses from the cylinders. Otherwise you could have a lazy exhaust flow and cause yourself more pain than gain. For my SWB truck a set of 2 1/2" dual exhaust pipes from my headers would provide the most optimum flow and not cause any reversionary effects.

I have a set of headers with 3" collectors that go to dual 2 1/2" pipes going back to an "H" pipe crossover and then into two Magnaflow stainless mufflers and then into pipes that are 2 1/2" pipes to the rear roll pan. I used to run Flowmaster but after having to replace the mufflers twice for rusting out, I went to the Magnaflow stainless mufflers.

According to most of the techs at the manufacturers, the 3" exhaust system would work great for a really large engine with a lot of assistance on the air intake, to make it work properly. Your street driven truck with a SBC will work very well with the 2 1/2" piping.
Thanks for the reply and any thoughts on where to run the pipe? I thought about exiting behind the rear wheel or maybe pointed down before the end of the bed as I'm not to crazy about the looks of pointing out the back of the bed
sneakyfast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2014, 12:30 AM   #5
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: exhaust opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by sneakyfast View Post
Thanks for the reply and any thoughts on where to run the pipe? I thought about exiting behind the rear wheel or maybe pointed down before the end of the bed as I'm not to crazy about the looks of pointing out the back of the bed
If you exit on the sides behind the rear tires, you will still get some noise feedback to the cab. If you turn down anywhere under the bed, there is also sound feedback to the cab, not to mention the one thing that I hate the most. The exhaust does nothing but stir up dust a garbage off of the ground when you drive. I take mine to the rear and then I use a MEGS stainless oval tip from Cone engineering to make the exhaust blend in with the bumper. It's just me, but that's my point of view.
Attached is a picture of my old 91 Silverado, but I also have my 2011 GMC set up this way.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Frank
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2014, 11:04 AM   #6
motornut
78K & 79C Jimmys
 
motornut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ottawa Ont CANADA
Posts: 7,901
Re: exhaust opinions

Yes my Jimmy with turn downs under the cab,
creates a cloud of dirt behind me,on rough/dirt/snowy roads...
not good for a nice paint job,but sounds good to me lol
__________________
John
1978 GMCJimmy4X4-350/203
1979 GMCJimmy4X2-305/350
motornut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2014, 11:34 AM   #7
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: exhaust opinions

Every guy for his own. Remember it is not just your paint job that you are blowing dirt up on. Nothing like being clean and shiny and someone going by and dusting it up for you.
__________________
Frank
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com