Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-03-2015, 06:42 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,334
|
Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
The BBC in my truck wants, according to the tuneup sticker, (I think) 4 degrees initial with an auto and maybe 0 degrees with a manual. But whatever the actual numbers, 4 is the ballpark. And it'll barely run like that.
Over the on Chevelle forums, where there's a bit more big block stuff going on, the consensus seems to be that most are finding 16 degrees initial is required for best idle, and you then wind up pulling out total so you don't overshoot. If that's true, great. But as much as old timers complain about "today's fuel", I still don't really know the how and why of us now needing so much more advance. It's not like nitro (very slow burning)!
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought 1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe 1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible |
05-03-2015, 09:19 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,659
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
I've got the big block in my 68 set up with an initial of 4btc. Runs great, does not ping. My small block 400 in my 69 flat bed is set at 6btc and runs as well as the BB, plenty of power and no pinging. If I take the timing up in either truck........pings like hell and does not want to start after it warms up, I get that hard starter spin
|
05-04-2015, 04:33 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: S.C.
Posts: 1,593
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
More initial can give you better throttle response, if your truck tolerates it.
Chevy specs, IMO, were to get the customer through the warranty period and pass emissions. My smallblock liked 14-16, BB 16-18. In my case, I would get starter backlash before it would ping. (running 87 octane)
__________________
'86 C-30 dually, 454/tbh400 '73 K-20 350/350/205 (sold ) I'm kinda like duct tape- no real purpose, but handy to have around. |
05-04-2015, 11:46 AM | #4 |
motor exploder
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,346
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
My BBC took 18 to idle cleanly with good throttle response. I have a Performance Distributors 'D.U.I.' distributor that they custom curved for me. They recommended 12* initial as a baseline and to go from there. I know that doesn't tell you the 'why' but it is what it is.
__________________
Adam 1969 Chevy CST/10 stepside, DART Big M/TREMEC Magnum Extreme/3.73's w/Detroit Truetrac 1965 Chevy Bel Air Wagon (daily driver), 327/TH350,10 bolt w/3.08's 1961 Chevy Bel Air Sport Coupe, ZZ454/M21/9" rear w/3.50's & Detroit Truetrac 2005 GMC 1500 ccsb 2wd, 6.0L/4L65e/3.73 G80 2006 GMC 2500HD ccsb 4x4, DMax LBZ/Allison 6spd/4.56's w/Detroit TrueTrac Use the SEARCH function on this forum - it is your friend!! |
05-04-2015, 12:19 PM | #5 |
Registered Truck Offender
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
The 'why' is more about the 'RATE OF BURN' in milliseconds and the expanding gasses exerting pressure on the piston for xx° after TDC. (low speed torque and throttle response) and the RATE OF COMPRESSION and the Max PSI of the fuel mix before it detonates.
There is a LOT of flys in the ointment tho... like, As RPM's increase you have to initiate the burn earlier, to have the gasses put as much USABLE pressure on the piston, for as many crank degrees possible. As the piston races away from TDC, it will make the effect of the expanding gasses 'less effective'. Just for example lets say gasoline will take 10milliseconds to do a 80% burn at 150PSI. And lets say it takes 20 milliseconds for the crank to sweep 90 degrees at 1000rpm All very dependant on stroke and rod length it may only take 5milliseconds to sweep 90 degrees at 6000rpm. We better start the burn EARLIER to have the best use of the fuel. Then too it may take WAY longer in a dished piston, large chamber low compression motor to complete a 80% burn, than it will a 12:1 motor. Not that there is NO pressure after xx°, just that it is not enough to create any really usable torque. i.e the exhaust valve opens on a Comp 284H at 100° (crank degrees) ater TDC,, the pressure is so negligible all it's good for is making a sonic boom in the exhaust pipe,, not any real 'torque'. The whole 'rate of burn' and how it is effected by compression, and the RATE of COMPRESSION is the science custom cam grinders deal with. If I know all that I'd be selling you cams LOL
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age! When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead. .....It's kinda the same when your STUPID. I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral. Last edited by Marv D; 05-04-2015 at 12:27 PM. |
05-04-2015, 01:21 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Star Valley, WY
Posts: 2,038
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
milliseconds? sweep? The? Let's say I get another cup of coffee
__________________
Steve 1971 GMC Longbox. Full Roller Stroker 489 w/ FiTech EFI, Chris Straub Cam/NV4500/205/D60/14B w. Grizzly Locker and 4.11's. 2" Lift on 33's |
05-04-2015, 01:29 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 10,384
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
Set the timing to how the engine runs best and call it good. Factory specs are going to be right for some engines and wrong for others because no engine is built Exactly the same. Some engines might like 8 degrees advanced while others may like 16 degrees advanced. Time it to how it performs the best and call it good, but don't advance it to far or you risk detonation.
__________________
1966 Chevy C10 "Project Two Tone" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596643 1964 GMC "Crustine" semi-build:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=665056 My youtube channel. Username "Military Chevy": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_h...fzpcUXyK_5-uiw |
05-04-2015, 04:45 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Blossvale NY
Posts: 202
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
Funny you bring this up...
My truck has a 350 in it. All of the following were installed by the PO. -Full length headers and 2.5" true duals -Edelbrock intake -Edelbrock 1406 carb -"Mild" cam claimed by PO but I have not confirmed. -Some sort of fancy red distributor I was doing some maintenance a couple of weeks ago and found my base timing at 16 deg. This engine shows the outward signs of an out-of-chassis rebuild not too long ago. I have had the truck a little over a year and it runs great. Low end seems pretty strong but it seems to really pull best between 2,000 and 3,000. Guess that can be attributed to the smaller CFM carb?? One thing I have learned though, it does prefer 89 octane fuel over 87. With 87 it would spark knock a little bit if I lugged it under 1200 rpm in 4th gear. I was wondering if I should back the timing down, but I talked to a fellow who is very knowledgeable with this stuff who told me that much timing is pretty common for the way my engine is set up.. So I left it as-is and run 89oct in it.
__________________
Who needs a Hemi when ya got a Chevy! |
05-04-2015, 08:02 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,469
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
Bulb blew in the timing light years ago, never needed it. I set it close, drive it and see how it does. Advance it till it pings, back it off. Hard hot start, same thing. My f'n malibu has a 454, 10:1, iron heads and runs 93. Starts just as easy hot as cold. Doesn't ping, instant throttle, (too much and your sideways) so I'd say it's pretty good.
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS 1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS 1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS |
05-04-2015, 08:59 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 409
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
I've never done anything less than 12. I start with 12* and tune from there. I'm currently at 16 initial and 36 all in. Chevelle tech is a great site. Lots of smarts over there also. Ddennis, is super knowledgable.
__________________
At my worst I'm at my best |
05-04-2015, 11:01 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Delta,Pa
Posts: 14,948
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
Scratch the factory sticker off of the core support. That sticker is there for emissions purposes. No engine runs best at the factory settings. If it did hot rodding wouldn't exist. The first thing guys did in the old days was reset the timing,recurve the distributor and rejet the carburetor. 16 isn't ridiculous on advance by any stretch.
__________________
Owner of North Point Car Care in Dundalk Md. We specialize in custom exhaust on both modern and classic vehicles. We are a full service auto shop from classics to modern vehicles. Feel free to contact me with questions. I will give a 10% discount to any board member. |
05-04-2015, 11:33 PM | #12 | |
Fabricate till you "puke"
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
Quote:
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears.... |
|
05-05-2015, 12:08 AM | #13 |
Registered Truck Offender
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
Yeah I guess I read too much into Dave saying he was curious of he How and Why of needing significant advance to make our 40 year old motors happy. I do that sometimes LOL
CL would love to have that conversation some time
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age! When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead. .....It's kinda the same when your STUPID. I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral. |
05-05-2015, 12:27 AM | #14 |
Fabricate till you "puke"
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
We will kick er, back/forth, one nite when my head is a little more clear! Trust me, you have raced for many yrs...I trust you, & will bet that I can learn a bunch from you longhorn
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears.... |
05-05-2015, 08:15 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 409
|
Re: Why do we need so much darned initial static timing?
Do you have a vacuum guage? And vac advance?
__________________
At my worst I'm at my best |
Bookmarks |
|
|