Rear Shock orientation - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

Jemezcrusher · 09-26-2016, 09:03 PM

I put a TCI parabolic rear spring and shock set up in my 1950 3100. My rear is an 8.8 out of an Exploder. The rear shock crossmember is set up to go behind the rear end. The rear end has a nice sway bar that I planned on using but is going to interfere with the shock location.

Any reason I can't locate to crossmember in front of the rear end at a similar angle as it was supposed to be behind it?

No big horse power. 235 with dual carbs and split exhaust with a T5

Rude Dude · 09-26-2016, 09:06 PM

Nope should work as long as you keep the working angle of shock at 25 degrees or less

Shinysideup · 10-01-2016, 09:24 AM

I used a exploder rear also, and used the spring, shock and swaybar as original. Why do your leaf springs interfere with this?

**mr48chev** · 10-01-2016, 11:32 AM

No reason not to if it makes for having it work the way you need it to. There are a few factory setups with the shocks in front of the axle. I think Ford F 150s have the shocks angled forward in front of the axle with the brackets on the bottom side of the axle.
Stock AD shocks angled forward in front of the axle.

OrrieG · 10-01-2016, 02:00 PM

Shocks do not know if they are in front or back. With stock spring setup front to back will not significantly make any difference. If it was a 4 link or swing arm conversion there might be a difference in how fast the shock responds and recovers depending on the distance from the mounting point to the lever arm pivot point. If you google shock layout there are sites that show now much efficiency you lose as the angle from vertical increases.

Jemezcrusher · 10-01-2016, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shinysideup

I used a exploder rear also, and used the spring, shock and swaybar as original. Why do your leaf springs interfere with this?

I am just eyeballing the shock location it's the TCI mount and will hit the sway bar, not the spring

Shinysideup · 10-01-2016, 05:21 PM

Just asking why use an aftermarket swaybar when it has one stock that fits? I used it and its endlinks, attached to frame.
Not my truck but explorer below for reference.

Jemezcrusher · 10-02-2016, 07:24 AM

If I put the shock crossmember in the recommended location, the boy of the shock is against the bracket that holds the stock exploder sway bar. Seems pretty easy to just move it on the other side of the diff (shock cross member I think)

09-26-2016, 09:03 PM	#1
Jemezcrusher Registered User Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Jemez Springs, NM Posts: 435	Rear Shock orientation I put a TCI parabolic rear spring and shock set up in my 1950 3100. My rear is an 8.8 out of an Exploder. The rear shock crossmember is set up to go behind the rear end. The rear end has a nice sway bar that I planned on using but is going to interfere with the shock location. Any reason I can't locate to crossmember in front of the rear end at a similar angle as it was supposed to be behind it? No big horse power. 235 with dual carbs and split exhaust with a T5

09-26-2016, 09:06 PM	#2
Rude Dude Registered User Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Glendale Arizona Posts: 1,188	Re: Rear Shock orientation Nope should work as long as you keep the working angle of shock at 25 degrees or less __________________ http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=436442

10-01-2016, 09:24 AM	#3
Shinysideup Registered User Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Ocala,Fl Posts: 733	Re: Rear Shock orientation I used a exploder rear also, and used the spring, shock and swaybar as original. Why do your leaf springs interfere with this?

10-01-2016, 11:32 AM	#4
mr48chev Registered User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toppenish, WA Posts: 15,710	Re: Rear Shock orientation No reason not to if it makes for having it work the way you need it to. There are a few factory setups with the shocks in front of the axle. I think Ford F 150s have the shocks angled forward in front of the axle with the brackets on the bottom side of the axle. Stock AD shocks angled forward in front of the axle. __________________ Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club. My ongoing truck projects: 48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six. 71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant. 77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.

10-01-2016, 02:00 PM	#5
OrrieG Registered User Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Idaho Posts: 8,800	Re: Rear Shock orientation Shocks do not know if they are in front or back. With stock spring setup front to back will not significantly make any difference. If it was a 4 link or swing arm conversion there might be a difference in how fast the shock responds and recovers depending on the distance from the mounting point to the lever arm pivot point. If you google shock layout there are sites that show now much efficiency you lose as the angle from vertical increases. __________________ 1959 Chevy Short Fleetside w/ 74 4WD drive train (current project) OrrieG Build Thread 1964 Chevelle Malibu w/ 355-350TH (daily driver) Helpful AD and TF Manual Site Old Car Manual Project

10-01-2016, 05:21 PM	#7
Shinysideup Registered User Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Ocala,Fl Posts: 733	Re: Rear Shock orientation Just asking why use an aftermarket swaybar when it has one stock that fits? I used it and its endlinks, attached to frame. Not my truck but explorer below for reference. Last edited by Shinysideup; 10-01-2016 at 05:33 PM.

10-02-2016, 07:24 AM	#8
Jemezcrusher Registered User Join Date: Nov 2015 Location: Jemez Springs, NM Posts: 435	Re: Rear Shock orientation If I put the shock crossmember in the recommended location, the boy of the shock is against the bracket that holds the stock exploder sway bar. Seems pretty easy to just move it on the other side of the diff (shock cross member I think)



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.