Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-09-2003, 02:26 PM | #1 |
Back from the Dead
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Salem, Oregon
Posts: 522
|
Single-Piece Driveshaft Questions
First off, I have a 72 SWB truck with trailing-arm suspension and I am contemplating converting it to a single-piece rear driveshaft because mine seems to be a bit bent and I am breaking carrier bearings a bit more often than I should How long does the single driveshaft need to be? I have a 12-bolt rearend and turbo350 trans. Also, I should add that I am running airbags, and am planning on notching the frame soon. I appreciate any help with this,
Thanks, Kenny
__________________
The only Carb that matters to me is the one under my hood! Salem, Oregon |
10-09-2003, 04:33 PM | #2 |
Project56 on hold
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
|
http://www.iedls.com/
This company has a great rep for outstanding driveshafts and also has measurements details..Inland Empire Driveline. |
10-09-2003, 06:08 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
|
I agree with Shamrock Customs about Inland Empire being the best drive shaft company in the country. I talked to them about going to a one piece ('68 short step, coil spring rear) and they recommended me not to. I've heard the maximum length that one should be as 5' and 6' (I'm sure plenty will chime in here). They can build one warrantied for 700hp (2 piece for our trucks) and also sell heavy duty carrier bearings. The drive shaft is a slip type on the rear. I'm still going to go one piece though. I am moving the motor as back as far as possible (gonna put that shifter right beside me). Maybe trying the carrier bearing from them will work for you?
__________________
'68 Short Step LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc |
10-13-2003, 07:57 PM | #4 |
Fabricate till you "puke"
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
|
I will tell you the same story! i have checked locally, & online......my longhorn is "stuck" with a 2 pc shaft. There are many shops that will build you a 1 pc shaft in that 6' range C to C on the caps......but most will tell you it will be a problem. I sure wouldnt think the shaft on a short wheel base truck would be any problem tho......if you are in the 4 -5' range, you should be able to rock with a 1 pc shaft , in the 3 1/2-4" dia range. it may take a little trimming on the crossmember, but shouldnt be a problem. Good luck,crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears.... |
10-15-2003, 07:54 PM | #5 |
Collector of Projects
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,106
|
I took a rough measurement today after work. I have a 71 SWB with a small block and th350 trans. It was 61" c to c ... thats still within the limits every one was talking about. There are other posts that talk about this same topic. One member measured the stock drive shaft out of his 86 C10 at 71". Thats a good 10 inches more that what I measured. The only catch is the diameter of the drive shaft and the fact that the 67-72 has limited space due to the center crossmember clearacne where the OE center bearing mounts. I also know there are other members who have one (cant remember who) ..
I am doing a 700r4 conversion and will be going to a one piece then ... I will ask around locally for a drive shaft when I get to that point ... |
10-15-2003, 08:12 PM | #6 |
Project56 on hold
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
|
mcmlxix:
replace ther center x-member with a driveshaft loop xmember.....clearance problem solved, left over bearing problem solved.... |
10-16-2003, 03:26 AM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
|
Quote:
__________________
'68 Short Step LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc |
|
11-03-2003, 03:07 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Linden, North Carolina
Posts: 617
|
take a sawzall to the carrier bearing brackets and put a one piece in, I run denny's shaft and no clearance problems(have trailing arms). if you don't cut the brackets off it will rub when you load the truck down heavy and hit a bump(trust me not a fun noise to hear)
__________________
64 Panel Rebuild Pics Clutch Replacement and Borg Warner T10 Trans Rebuild 64 Panel 1/2 Ton 350cubes/400hp BorgWarner t-10 3:73 Auburn Posi |
11-03-2003, 06:53 PM | #10 |
Project56 on hold
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
|
68LSS1: sure, no prob. the new loop x-member will also be the mounting point for the trailing arms. thing is, you can't use just any x-member. it need to be full size to support the trailing arms. the center section of the new x-member will be a loop instead of straight. this will allow extra clearance for the new driveshaft. the loop should be a good 1" OD tube with at least 1/8" thick wall, preferably 3/16" thick. hope this helps!
__________________
Shamrock Customs Forever-in-the-Future Custom Shop 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS daily driver 1956 Chevy Stepside rodstoration on winter hold |
11-04-2003, 12:14 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
|
I just don't think I'd trust that for the hp/torque I hope to be seeing. I may end up having to do something like that though.
__________________
'68 Short Step LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc |
11-04-2003, 01:50 PM | #12 |
Progress = 0%
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
|
I have a 1-piece shaft in my '67 short bed. I have a 350/700R4 (in the 6-cyl position), with air bags/c-notch and I have no clearance problems.
My truck was originally a long bed with a 1-piece drive shaft (yes, that is how it came from the factory). I had that shaft cut down and balanced for about $60. So if you can find a 1-piece shaft that is longer than what you need, you can have it shortened for less $$$$ than it would cost to have one made from scratch.
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra |
11-04-2003, 02:02 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
|
I'll need the 700hp warranty that Inland puts on their ds along with the 1350 u joints.
__________________
'68 Short Step LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc |
11-05-2003, 12:03 AM | #14 |
Project56 on hold
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
|
this is pretty much what i am talking about. granted, this is a 4link setup, but i think you get the idea......
|
11-16-2003, 03:51 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: nova scotia
Posts: 179
|
I have a long wheel base 68 step when I went to the t-5 five speed I went to the salvage yard and bought a shaft from a 86 long wheel base half ton (had the old coupler taken off the rear and welded it to the new shaft by a pro shop). The reason why I used a 86 shaft is they are larger in diameter (less whip) ie. better for larger amounts of HP. I did not half to cut the cross because the truck is lowered, all I had to worry about is the pitch of the rear diff. I am sure if you are going to a one peice shaft, and doing every thing for the short wheel base the same it should work
hope this helps |
11-22-2003, 11:18 AM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: BRADENTON FLA
Posts: 3,269
|
Shamrockcustoms any reason for the 45 degree panhard bars over a 90 degree setup? We have been playing with a Watts linkage panhead bar setup with an offset center point on the upper and lower bars.
__________________
Rest in Peace Ed. Thanks for all the good times. |
11-22-2003, 09:29 PM | #17 |
Project56 on hold
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Burleson, TX
Posts: 489
|
mothertruckers: well, the photo is just one from a show site. what i can tell you is that the diagonal link is best suited for racing applications because the link does not allow for cornering very well. the end links usually will wear out pretty quick. the panahrd bar is much better for the street. ( i was mainly illustrating the front crossmember setup. )
|
Bookmarks |
|
|