The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1969 - 1972 Blazers and Jimmys Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2003, 12:58 AM   #1
71Blazer
Goodbye Darlin'
 
71Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Coupeville, WA USA
Posts: 330
Broncos are better than Blazers

AND UGLIER!! they left out that part...

Here's some blue oval propaganda from 1979 given to f*#d salesmen to dupe the unsuspecting public (for instance the square headlights were a selling point over the much despised "round" headlights ). 6 pages of Bronco vs. Blazer. Very interesting...

Pg1http://www.projectbronco.com/Literat...azer/page1.htm

__________________
1971 Blazer CST SOLD!

Last edited by 71Blazer; 11-14-2003 at 05:32 AM.
71Blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2003, 03:48 AM   #2
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
interesting read...

if the Bronco would have been available with the 300 cube L6, I think that would have been an actual better vehicle. I don't really care for the 351 and 400 W and M engines. But with the 300 six, NP435 tranny, NP205 transfer case, dana 44 front, and 9 inch rearend, the Bronco is hard to beat. Also notice how the full time 4wd is an option on the Bronco. How many full time 4x4 Bronco's or F-series trucks have you seen? Not many, thats for sure. And unfortunately, all the Blazers were. Plus teh Bronco had more common 5 lug wheels. just my 2 cents.

also, it says the Bronco doesn't have a convertible top, but the Blazer does...i thought both had the removable "half roof" over the rear cargo area. hmm.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2003, 04:19 AM   #3
71Blazer
Goodbye Darlin'
 
71Blazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Coupeville, WA USA
Posts: 330
From what I can tell the Bronco top was Standard equipment, the Blazer top was a $100 option?

I wonder how many were ordered with a bench seat in the front? That's something I've considered for my Blazer but it would have had to be a split bench unless you're a gymnast!
__________________
1971 Blazer CST SOLD!
71Blazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 02:22 AM   #4
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
i think they do, i test drove a '78 or '79 Bronco a while back that had dual benches. the front one was a split, but i have no idea if it was original or not. guy was asking only $300(!), body was pretty much trash, but had under 50k miles, had been used as a plow truck...came with the plow too! but we went back the next day with $ and it was gone. Oh well, if I would have bought it I wouldn't be writing this on this wonderful site now.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 05:03 AM   #5
JayDubBlazer
go cyclones
 
JayDubBlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 1,883
I was going to have 78 Bronco for my first car. I really liked it. But the tie-rods were bad I I ended up getting a 2wd s10 blazer.
It is pretty obvious that the pamphlet was printed by F*rd.
__________________
Wes



PROJECT OLE GREEN

1972 Blazer 4X4 350/700R4
2017 Silverado LT
JayDubBlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 02:04 PM   #6
JIMs70GMC
user # 2756
 
JIMs70GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 4,612
I have a neighbor that has a 79 bronco that is full time 4wd. He hates it. Right now it's sitting in his backyard w/ a dead cylinder(no compression). I believe it's a 400M engine, he's ging to drop a built 302 in one day.
__________________
1970 K25, 8' stepside bed 350/465/205 44 up front, 60 in the rear 4.10s rolling on 33" Dunlop MTs
1986 K5, 350/465/208 Dana 60/14 bolt from a cucv 36" Super Swampers TSL/SX
1983 K20 w/ CUCV axles, 350/700R4/208 sitting on 37" Goodyears
1986 M1031 6.2 diesel, TH400/NP205 locker in the rear and a LS in the front, all stock for now.....
1986 K30, 350/400/205 dana 60 and 14 bolt. I kept the drivetrain. Body/bad and chassis are gone.
1981 K30, 350/465/205 dana 60 and dually 14 bolt. Has a G80, and a flat bed. Going to replace the flat bed.

1985 K20, 350/400/208 10 bolt and SF 14 bolt. I wonder where I can find some 1 tons. Hmmmmm
JIMs70GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2003, 07:37 PM   #7
Paul72
Registered User
 
Paul72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Waterloo, IA
Posts: 1,147
The thread title had me scared for a minute... Didn't think the board was down that long for you to jump the fence!!
__________________
'72 Chevy K20 - 383/4sp/205 - SOLD after 41 years in the family
Next project - K/5 Tahoe (71 Blazer on 99 Tahoe chassis) Build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=789958
Paul72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2003, 03:25 AM   #8
ClAsSiC_nUT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 39
Although you all do make very good points about the 78-79 Bronco's. The 66-77 Bronco's take the cake. Don't get me wrong I have an appreciation for all the classics. Here's my view, my 69 bronco has everything my 70 blazer has, a full convertible top(both), Dana 44 front end, 9inch rear end vs 12 bolt rear end, power steering (both), power brakes (both), well built 351w vs 350 chevy but my Bronco has a fully boxed frame (STOCK), Blazer C channel. The Bronco has a tighter turning radius, is packed full of full sized power stuuffed into a smaller tighter packege. All I'm sayin' is don't knock em till you've tried em.


Hey I forgot to mention that the Blazer is for sale.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My toys
57CC Chevy 1/2ton 4x2 stepside short bed - - in progress
64CC Chevy 3/4ton 4x4 fleetside short bed - - in progress
69 Bronco - - - - - - in progress
70 Blazer - It's a Diamond in the ruff but workable - For Sale
72 Cutlass Supreme 2dr origin - - - Complete
96 Dodge Stratus - - - - - (My Day to Day)

Last edited by ClAsSiC_nUT; 11-13-2003 at 03:28 AM.
ClAsSiC_nUT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2003, 03:47 AM   #9
k5bucket_o_rust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 48
Better than blazer HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Anything that has a four letter word in front of it is not better than a blazer. we all know that.
__________________
1972 k5 blazer
1969 Camaro
1955 Chevy 210 2 dr post
1985 Toyota SR5 4X4
1997 4 letter F word Explo(x)der
k5bucket_o_rust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2003, 10:57 AM   #10
2wdBlazer
The Blazer King
 
2wdBlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Valrico, Fl (Tampa)
Posts: 1,212
Quote:
Originally posted by ClAsSiC_nUT
Although you all do make very good points about the 78-79 Bronco's. The 66-77 Bronco's take the cake. Don't get me wrong I have an appreciation for all the classics. Here's my view, my 69 bronco has everything my 70 blazer has, a full convertible top(both), Dana 44 front end, 9inch rear end vs 12 bolt rear end, power steering (both), power brakes (both), well built 351w vs 350 chevy but my Bronco has a fully boxed frame (STOCK), Blazer C channel. The Bronco has a tighter turning radius, is packed full of full sized power stuuffed into a smaller tighter packege. All I'm sayin' is don't knock em till you've tried em.

I do believe 66-77 Bronco's are the best looking of the Bronco's. A full convertible that keeps the window frames just doesn't look right too me. Also, Those wierd looking rear wheel wheels are gross too.
__________________
72 2wd Blazer. Its the superbichinest, megacoolinest, superflowinest.
2wdBlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2003, 12:36 PM   #11
Bluegoose972
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 248
I'm pretty much a die hard chevy fan, but I think Project Crazyhorse turned out pretty cool!

http://www.staceydavid.com/images/Cr...r-view-WEB.jpg
Bluegoose972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2003, 11:31 PM   #12
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ClAsSiC_nUT
[B]well built 351w vs 350 chevy

i was under the impression that the largest engine the 66-77's came with was the 302. did you swap it in?

if we REALLY had to pick sides, i'd take a 1980 Scout II. T-18 or T-19 4 spd tranny (always forget which), Dana 300 transfer, Nissan turbodiesel, dana 44 front and rear, full convert (no window frames), no weird wheelwells like bronco, and a little more uncommon. or, any year Scout II with 345 V8, but '80 was the only year for the 300. Internationals suffer because they seemed to be made of compressed rust, though.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 02:39 AM   #13
ClAsSiC_nUT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 39
1969 GMC - Yeah my bronco originally came with a 302 but the guy I bought the truck from pulled the motor and tranny out, so I thought Why not give It more Power and put the 351W In It .My bronco window frames are Chopped and capped for the full look but I have extra set of doors If I change my mind.

2wd Blazer -- What do you mean by Gross fender Wells??Please Explain.?.?

Hey Bucket O Rust --- you're gonna have to come up with something a little better than that to try and make your point. Oh and by the way It seems that every blazer that I've come across has had some of the worst rust that I could Imagine and I'm from PHOENIX. Especially 67-72 chevy trucks and Blazers. not to mention that 3 out of 4 of them, the frames cracked in some stupid place and that's just from light four wheelin'.

Again I still say Don't knock em' till you try em'..hey I will concede to the point that a stock for stock truck the Blazer's do have a better look to them.

Last edited by ClAsSiC_nUT; 11-14-2003 at 02:46 AM.
ClAsSiC_nUT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 02:47 AM   #14
ClAsSiC_nUT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 39
The Bronco frames are still stronger..
ClAsSiC_nUT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 10:37 AM   #15
2wdBlazer
The Blazer King
 
2wdBlazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Valrico, Fl (Tampa)
Posts: 1,212
Quote:
Originally posted by ClAsSiC_nUT


2wd Blazer -- What do you mean by Gross fender Wells??Please Explain.?.?

Rear fender well drops low and covers like half the rear tire.
__________________
72 2wd Blazer. Its the superbichinest, megacoolinest, superflowinest.
2wdBlazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 02:07 PM   #16
smokekiki
Mike
 
smokekiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: west chester pa
Posts: 2,473
I have a 69 bronco trail rig.Bushwacker flares take care of the rear fenders.You pull the hinge pins and the whole door comes off.
__________________
70'c/10, 71 suburban4x4 402bb, 72suburban 4/6 drop, 72k/5 4x4 blazer 4" lift 35 tires
smokekiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 08:42 PM   #17
ClAsSiC_nUT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 39
My Bronco has the flares too it definately looks better than the uncut.
ClAsSiC_nUT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com