|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-25-2019, 12:15 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,728
|
1969 vs 1970 Rochester 2G carb difference?
Thinking about buying one of the $100 replacement carbs on Amazon for my 307 powered '69 C10. But they all so for '70 and up. Any real difference between the 69 and 70 carbs that would make this more difficult than a bolt on?
I've been through this carb a couple of times and the accelerator pump well has issues and for a C-note if it improves driveablity until I get the 427 swapped in, I'm good with that.
__________________
44 Willys MB 52 M38A1 64 Corvette Coupe 68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700 69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110 69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop 72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's 02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax |
|
|
|
12-25-2019, 02:02 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Eastern Oregon
Posts: 2,394
|
Re: 1969 vs 1970 Rochester 2G carb difference?
The one on my 71 C-20 with 307 is acting up also. An older gentleman who has been rebuilding carbs for decades told me these are quite difficult to overhaul properly. I priced a kit from NSPA, almost $50.00 . Seems a hundred is a deal.
__________________
71 C-20 07 Magnum RT AWD |
|
|
|
|
12-25-2019, 02:43 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: SE Idaho
Posts: 154
|
Re: 1969 vs 1970 Rochester 2G carb difference?
I used a kit from Mike's for $25. He also has a bunch of youtube videos that were very helpful.
https://www.carburetor-parts.com/Car...its_c_573.html Last edited by swb4me; 12-25-2019 at 02:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
12-25-2019, 02:50 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: SE Idaho
Posts: 154
|
Re: 1969 vs 1970 Rochester 2G carb difference?
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
