The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-25-2020, 01:12 PM   #1
flashed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,724
Front Control Arms ??????

What is the benefit of tubular control arms versus stock for my 70 C10 ? I already have drop spindles and 5 lug rotors , and the rear will have the stock trailing arms with lowering springs . Would I be wasting my money on the Tubular control arms ?
flashed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2020, 04:36 PM   #2
LS short box
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 2,132
Re: Front Control Arms ??????

Most of the aftermarket arms will allow more caster
LS short box is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2020, 12:04 PM   #3
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Front Control Arms ??????

Tubular arms will be more rigid vs. the stamped steel arms but that is subjective as to what level of improvement one sees. For a normal. everyday driven vehicle, I doubt you'd notice. If you're building a Sport-truck & plan on some auto-crossing, tubular would be better.

Many aftermarket suppliers advertise 'better geometry' but again that's subjective. One can achieve similar 'better geometry' results w/tweaks to the factory stuff & just as important, UPDATED alignment target specs. So it comes down to what physical changes were done to achieve that better geometry.

They might also advertise 'better bushings'. Again... subjective. The 70C10 arm had the rubber lined steel sleeve set-up. It was considered HD then as trucks were for work. Later model Square-body trucks got the car style bushings that were more 'forgiving' for better ride quality. The later style bushings will deflect more vs the 'Poly bushings' offered in many tubular arms. The down side? Poly bushings are subjectively notorious for:
*Noise (squeaking/popping) once in place for a while.
*Stiction/binding (allowing partial movement/rotation then binding; partial movement then binding vs a full smooth rotation).
*Transmitting increased levels of NVH/vibrations/noise.

The early bushings are on par w/Poly bushings for limiting deflection & guess what... they can do it w/o the squeaks. But, they don't give a cushy new car ride quality & they only work for the OE control arms. Even higher up are tubular arms w/Delrin bushings. These limit deflection even more but are machined so they can pivot w/o the binding associated to the Poly units. Delrin set-ups in theory shouldn't squeak & they should be bind-free which allows the suspension (coils/shocks) to do their intended jobs easier. I haven't experienced a Delrin set-up on an extended use basis so I can't comment on the validity of that statement. My 64 is going to be my first experience as that's how I'm building it now.

Some aftermarket tubular arms are offered in a narrowed configuration depending on how deep the modifications go. It requires a good effort to tweak OE stamped arms to achieve that goal.

Some aftermarket tubular arms use smaller bushing barrels for the pivot bushings which can help w/ground clearance on aggressively lowered trucks.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 07-27-2020 at 12:10 PM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2020, 04:30 PM   #4
theastronaut
Registered User
 
theastronaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Anderson SC
Posts: 3,901
Re: Front Control Arms ??????

Scoti has really good info in his post. I've said for awhile that slapping in a 73-87 crossmember and arms is a *downgrade* because they use the huge rubber bushings that deflect and won't hold an alignment as well as the 63-72 bushings.

I'll add that arms can't alter geometry no matter what they're advertised to do, they can only alter the alignment. Pivot points of the suspension sets the geometry. Unless you alter the actual pivot points (fixed by the spindle and a-arm pivot mounts) you're not altering geometry.

You **can** use taller upper ball joints to change the upper ball joint pivot point which will add camber gain.

You can get upper control arm pivots with dropped pivots points to alter the geometry, Hotchkis arms uses this on their arms.

Narrowing the a-arms will move the pivot points of the ball joints, which should increase camber gain slightly.

You can also get arms that move the wheel forward 1" to center the wheels in the fender opening for lowered trucks.
theastronaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2020, 03:00 AM   #5
Baker819
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: WA
Posts: 119
Re: Front Control Arms ??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS short box View Post
Most of the aftermarket arms will allow more caster
I've read posts on here how to modify oem parts for the same caster gain. Pretty simple too.
Baker819 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2020, 03:15 PM   #6
flashed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: canton ga
Posts: 12,724
Re: Front Control Arms ??????

With what New A Arm sets cost I am probably just going to rebuild my stock ones and use that money for a nice LS Radiator .
flashed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2020, 04:26 PM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,066
Re: Front Control Arms ??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by flashed View Post
With what New A Arm sets cost I am probably just going to rebuild my stock ones and use that money for a nice LS Radiator .
Rebuild the stockers & do the Caster Mod:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ght=Caster+mod
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com