03-28-2021, 07:24 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jonesboro, AR
Posts: 410
|
2.73 rear end
I recently acquired an unfinished project, '81 jimmy that has been converted to 2wd. It has no engine or transmission. I just checked the rear end ratio by jacking up one wheel and spinning it 2 revs and was surprised to find it's less than 3. I checked the net and found that there was a 2.42 and 2.73 available. I believe mine is 2.73. Now I'm trying to get my mind around the best engine/transmission combination to look for. Does anyone out there have info on what was used originally on trucks with this rear ratio? I plan to make a driver, no racing or towing, but I do have some hills to deal with. Should I start looking for a different rear axle? Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Thanks. |
03-28-2021, 08:27 AM | #2 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,221
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
If you are running a T350 or T400 and V8, then that rear will be a nice cruiser. But, it will lack any omph from a dead start. If you are doing a OD style tranny, then I would look for a 3:42 or 3:73 rear gear for it.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
03-28-2021, 10:31 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,611
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
Use one of the online RPM calculation sites. Feed in your rear end ratio and tire diameter and get your engine RPM back. Since you are after a driver instead of a load hauler, a smaller tire might be a simpler answer then a rear end change.
|
03-28-2021, 10:49 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: North-central Virginia
Posts: 1,104
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
The very low ratios were usually paired with the straight six engines. Those engines are torque monsters, particularly right off idle, but they don't rev high. I would look into a built 292, with an emphasis on bottom-end torque instead of HP. It should feel and drive similar to a diesel when all's said and done. A manual transmission will make it all the better.
I'm driving a bone-stock 1981 2wd f150 with a 300-i6, four-speed manual, 2.73 gears, and 28" tires. It's a hoot just tooling around local country roads. The bottom-end torque is unbelievable, and fuel economy is pushing 20 mpg on longer trips.
__________________
1987 C6P V20 truck, 2010 LMG 5.3, AFM delete, 2010 Camaro exhaust manifolds, 1997 nv4500, 1991 np241c, hydroboost, 2005 14bff axle & driveshaft, drop-n-lock gooseneck, 4.10 gears, stock suspension, rims, and tires. Still a work in progress. Any questions or suggestions are welcome! |
03-28-2021, 05:43 PM | #5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,696
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
Quote:
Danged if it wasn't a 292 straight six! We obviously didn't see many of those. And most of the new vehicles ran like crap because they hadn't been adjusted for the altitude yet (Colorado Springs). Actually, I would love to swap out the oil burning 350 in my 76 GMC for a 292 My friend down in CO has his dad's old 1965 K20 with a 292. Only vehicle in the world that I'm jealous of
__________________
Current/past Chevy/GMC trucks: 1958 Chevy C-60; 1965 GMC C-50; 1965 Chevy C-10; 1971 Chevy K-10; 1973 Chevy K-20; 1976 GMC C-20; 1977 Chevy C-10 Suburban; 1980 Chevy K-10; 1989 Chevy K1500; 1991 GMC V1500 Suburban; 2016 Chevy K2500 HD Other vehicles: 1988 Jeep XJ; 2011 Toyota 4Runner |
|
03-28-2021, 08:04 PM | #6 |
Post Whore
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Alabama
Posts: 14,670
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
my 86 had 2.73s.. it came with a 305/sm465
but like stated..work the gear ratio around your engine/trans/tire combo
__________________
Mongo...aka Greg RIP Dad RIP Jesse 1981 C30 LQ9 NV4500..http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=753598 Mongos AD- LS3 TR6060...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...34#post8522334 Columbus..the 1957 IH 4x4...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...63#post8082563 2023 Chevy Z71..daily driver |
03-28-2021, 10:01 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,634
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
My dads truck came with the 2.73s. 1982 1/2t shorty. Engine----6.2 diesel with a 700r4. It has been changed out
|
03-28-2021, 11:30 PM | #8 |
At the body shop.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,256
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
I've had 2.73 and also 3.08 in multiple trucks with a 27" tall tire
Any decent engine will pull the gear all day and get decent mileage.
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer " " Dont antique the equipment " |
04-02-2021, 08:17 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Perry, Oklahoma
Posts: 157
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
My 85 had 2.73's and a 700r4 from the factory.
I swapped in a TH350 and even with a very stout 383 it was pretty underwhelming off idle (28 inch tire). Now with that being said it would absolutely cruise down the interstate pulling my boat at 75+mph. I swapped cam/convertor and went to 3.73's but I have to admit that I miss the 2.73's on the highway. Its a fantastic ratio with a 3spd auto if you just want to drive down the highway.
__________________
85 Scottsdale LWB 383 227/235 105 lsa Howards Roller TH350 by Jakes Performance, Sanger TX |
04-02-2021, 09:37 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,718
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
My 77 burban had 3.08s . With the anemic mid 70s motor and tall gears felt like it took forever to get to highway speed . Living in the north east it was fun hitting some of the mountains at 75 and mashing the pedal down and without even pulling a trailer I'd below 55 at the Crest. But it was nice to cruise at 80 on the flat lands
__________________
Mark 72 c20 custom camper Husky edition, 66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark 1969 AMX , 1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20 1977 Suburban sold 68 anniversary. |
04-02-2021, 01:29 PM | #11 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,221
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
2.73s were the standard axle for 6 cylinder vehicles in 81. a 2.56 was the standard for V8s. Most v8s were optioned with either 2.73 or 3.08s. Again plan around what engine/tranny and tire combo you have and what you want.
My 81GMC C1500 is a 250 six with T350c and the 2.73 rear gears. It does fine, but definitely not a hot rod off the line.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! |
04-02-2021, 04:48 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: MINNEAPOLIS
Posts: 36
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
I have an 84 with a 305/350 2.73 from the factory. Just swapped it out for a 3.42 and love the pep it gave in the little motor. I do suspect it will be a bit less comfy on the highway, though.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|