02-24-2004, 04:14 PM | #1 |
Mudslides 'r my specialty
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Posts: 1,106
|
3.5/5 or 4.5/5 Drop?
If you are wondering why the odd setup, check out Timspeed's sticky.
2.5 McGaughy drop spindles 1" or 2" drop coil springs 5" rear flip kit I am running stock 15s, so I want 2.5 drop spindles to prevent rubbing. So, on top of that I can go with 2" drop coils (cheaper) or 1" drop coils. My thought is, if I go with the 4.5 in front, I can easily make the 5" drop in the rear a 6" drop with shackles later if I want to. Anyone have pics of a 4.5/5 or 4.5/6 drop?
__________________
Always on the lookout for old cars and parts...(20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, etc.) http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/500339 |
02-24-2004, 04:21 PM | #2 |
You get what you pay for
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
|
Western Chassis makes 1.5" coils. 4/6 will sit level. A 4.5/6 would be a good setup. One thing on these trucks I wish was different. There is around 1.25" difference in the fenderwell lips. So if you go level, there will still be the 1.25" showing above the tire. I still haven't figured out what the reason was behind this. But as we all know, GM is not too concerned with doing things that make a whole lot of sense. I'm also sure they were not worried about us lowering them either.
__________________
Mike 1985 Chevy C-10 |
02-24-2004, 04:24 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lewisville, NC
Posts: 1,836
|
I believe they made the fender lip like that so that the truck would "look" like it is sitting level since the trucks backend always sat a little higher anyway.
__________________
1985 Scottsdale Shortbed 4x4 Stout 350 with some "upgrades"-700r4-33x12.5" Mud Tires, Warn 8274-50 winch. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado Regular Cab 2wd 4-banger, 5 speed, Street Pack with 3.73 axle. |
02-24-2004, 04:31 PM | #4 |
You get what you pay for
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
|
You may just be right. With the 2" rake they had, this would make sense. Also, the 1.25" would give it more turning room/clearance I guess.
|
02-24-2004, 04:55 PM | #5 |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,755
|
Id go 5.5/6" myself, or at minimum 5/5.5" O wait, that is what I did
Go for the bigger drop always. You will eventually so do it now and save some time.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
02-24-2004, 05:58 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlantic City, NJ
Posts: 1,073
|
As much as I hate to agree with Tom, he's right
__________________
86 SWB 9.0 LITER T-400-OD 4.11 eaton-4/5 drop Best 1/4 12.51 @112mph no traction |
02-24-2004, 06:17 PM | #7 |
Mudslides 'r my specialty
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Posts: 1,106
|
Mike,
I agree, I don't like the gap caused by the uneven fender heights on a level truck. That is why I want a little bit of rake, and won't do a 3/5 or 4/6. I know about the 1.5" coils. I have a credit with Summit, so I thought I would use their 2" coils. So, since the rearend is easy to lower later on, should I go ahead and do a 4.5 in front and a 5 in the rear for now? (I already have the shackle to go another inch if I want to later) I just hope it isn't too low.
__________________
Always on the lookout for old cars and parts...(20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, etc.) http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/500339 |
02-24-2004, 06:24 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lewisville, NC
Posts: 1,836
|
Quote:
__________________
1985 Scottsdale Shortbed 4x4 Stout 350 with some "upgrades"-700r4-33x12.5" Mud Tires, Warn 8274-50 winch. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado Regular Cab 2wd 4-banger, 5 speed, Street Pack with 3.73 axle. |
|
02-24-2004, 06:52 PM | #9 | |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,755
|
Quote:
|
|
02-24-2004, 07:02 PM | #10 |
Under construction!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,065
|
Go 5/7" and be done with it.
__________________
2001 Silverado bagged on 22's. *Sold* |
02-24-2004, 07:11 PM | #11 |
Mudslides 'r my specialty
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Posts: 1,106
|
I am trying to paste a spreadsheet I did with fender height vs. tire diameter. It's not working.
baggedc10, a 5/7 would not allow me to get into my driveway.
__________________
Always on the lookout for old cars and parts...(20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, etc.) http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/500339 |
02-24-2004, 07:17 PM | #12 |
You get what you pay for
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
|
IMO, the difference between 4 and 4.5 isn't much. But it will reduce the gap a tad. It sure would be nice if they were built even in the first place. This gripes me about as much as anything on these trucks. I don't like a rake on a truck at all and without going to 5/7 there is now way to get rid of the gap without a rake.
__________________
Mike 1985 Chevy C-10 |
02-24-2004, 07:48 PM | #13 | |
Insert Witty Text Here
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,415
|
Quote:
Slonaker |
|
02-25-2004, 02:47 PM | #14 |
Mudslides 'r my specialty
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: STL
Posts: 1,106
|
I will try that.
__________________
Always on the lookout for old cars and parts...(20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, etc.) http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/500339 |
Bookmarks |
|
|